LIU Z Y, WANG X W, WANG X, et al. Experimental study of the mechanism of drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers on the superhydrophobic structured wall with microstructure[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220016.
Citation: LIU Z Y, WANG X W, WANG X, et al. Experimental study of the mechanism of drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers on the superhydrophobic structured wall with microstructure[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220016.

Experimental study of the mechanism of drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers on the superhydrophobic structured wall with microstructure

More Information
  • Received Date: February 17, 2022
  • Revised Date: April 09, 2022
  • Accepted Date: April 17, 2022
  • Available Online: August 28, 2023
  • The drag reduction mechanism of the wall turbulent boundary layer with superhydrophobic micro-riblets and micro-convex posts is studied experimentally. The instantaneous velocity field in the turbulent boundary layer of the hydrophilic wall, superhydrophobic micro-riblets wall and micro-convex posts wall is measured by high time resolution particle image velocimetry (TRPIV). The frictional shear stress of the three kinds of walls is compared and analyzed. It is found that the superhydrophobic walls achieve drag reduction effect. However, the drag reduction rate of the superhydrophobic micro-riblets wall is higher than that of the superhydrophobic micro-convex posts wall, and the drag reduction rate of the superhydrophobic micro-riblets wall is 13.8%, while the drag reduction rate of the superhydrophobic micro-convex posts wall is 10.2%. Through comparison and analysis on the three kinds of wall corresponding average velocity profile in the turbulent boundary layer, turbulence intensity and Reynolds shear stress profile, it is found that the fluid indeed has sliding speed in the superhydrophobic wall, and in the area of the same normal height at 15<y+<100, the streamwise turbulence intensity corresponding to the hydrophilic wall, superhydrophobic micro-riblets and micro-convex posts wall decreases successively. At the same time, in the area of the same normal height at 30<y+<80,the wall-normal turbulence intensity of the superhydrophobic micro-convex posts, hydrophilic wall and superhydrophobic micro-riblets wall decrease successively. Over the whole wall-normal height, the maximum values of Reynolds shear stress on the hydrophilic wall, superhydrophobic micro-convex posts and micro-riblets wall decrease successively. Based on the conditional sampling and phase averaging of the spanwise vortex identified by the Λcicriterion, it is found that the amplitude of the fourth quadrant event induced by the spanwise vortex of the superhydrophobic micro-riblets wall weakens nearby at y + 63, which leads to the intensity of its sweep events decreasing, and then the drag reduction is realized. In order to further analyze the turbulent fluctuation energy, the instantaneous fluctuation velocity of the whole turbulent boundary layer is summed in time and over the streamwise-normal space by using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and it is dimensionless to characterize the fluctuation degree of the flow field. The results show that the spanwise slip characteristics of the superhydrophobic micro-convex posts increase the drag and weaken the drag reduction effect caused by the streamwise slip. The streamwise slip characteristics of the superhydrophobic micro-riblets wall can effectively suppress turbulence fluctuation and achieve better drag reduction effects.
  • [1]
    LIU M, MA L R. Drag reduction methods at solid-liquid interfaces[J]. Friction, 2022, 10(4): 491–515. doi: 10.1007/s40544-021-0502-8
    [2]
    WANG S T, LIU K S, YAO X, et al. Bioinspired surfaces with superwettability: new insight on theory, design, and applications[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(16): 8230–8293. doi: 10.1021/cr400083y
    [3]
    ROTHSTEIN J P. Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 42: 89–109. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145558
    [4]
    MARUSIC I, MATHIS R, HUTCHINS N. Predictive model for wall-bounded turbulent flow[J]. Science, 2010, 329(5988): 193–196. doi: 10.1126/science.1188765
    [5]
    ADRIAN R J. Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 23: 261–304. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.001401
    [6]
    WESTERWEEL J, ELSINGA G E, ADRIAN R J. Particle image velocimetry for complex and turbulent flows[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 45: 409–436. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101204
    [7]
    ADRIAN R J, MEINHART C D, TOMKINS C D. Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 422: 1–54. doi: 10.1017/s0022112000001580
    [8]
    ADRIAN R J. Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2007, 19(4): 041301. doi: 10.1063/1.2717527
    [9]
    DANIELLO R J, WATERHOUSE N E, ROTHSTEIN J P. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2009, 21(8): 085103. doi: 10.1063/1.3207885
    [10]
    KITAGAWA A, SHIOMI Y, MURAI Y, et al. Transient velocity profiles and drag reduction due to air-filled superhydrophobic grooves[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2020, 61(11): 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00348-020-03070-x
    [11]
    LEE C, CHOI C H, KIM C J “. Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 101(6): 064501. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.064501
    [12]
    LEE C, CHOI C H, KIM C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: a critical review[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2016, 57(12): 176. doi: 10.1007/s00348-016-2264-z
    [13]
    XU M C, GRABOWSKI A, YU N, et al. Superhydrophobic drag reduction for turbulent flows in open water[J]. Physical Review Applied, 2020, 13(3): 034056. doi: 10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034056
    [14]
    PARK H, CHOI C H, KIM C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction in turbulent flows: a critical review[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2021, 62(11): 229. doi: 10.1007/s00348-021-03322-4
    [15]
    LING H J, SRINIVASAN S, GOLOVIN K, et al. High-resolution velocity measurement in the inner part of turbulent boundary layers over super-hydrophobic surfaces[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 801: 670–703. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2016.450
    [16]
    ABU ROWIN W, GHAEMI S. Streamwise and spanwise slip over a superhydrophobic surface[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 870: 1127–1157. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2019.225
    [17]
    姚朝晖, 张静娴, 郝鹏飞. 表面微纳结构对气-水界面稳定性和流动减阻的影响[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(2): 73–79.

    YAO Z H, ZHANG J X, HAO P F. Effect of surface micro/nano-structure on gas-water interface stability and flow drag reduction[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(2): 73–79.
    [18]
    VAJDI HOKMABAD B, GHAEMI S. Turbulent flow over wetted and non-wetted superhydrophobic counterparts with random structure[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(1): 015112. doi: 10.1063/1.4940325
    [19]
    WOOLFORD B, PRINCE J, MAYNES D, et al. Particle image velocimetry characterization of turbulent channel flow with rib patterned superhydrophobic walls[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2009, 21(8): 085106. doi: 10.1063/1.3213607
    [20]
    MARTELL M B, PEROT J B, ROTHSTEIN J P. Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 620: 31–41. doi: 10.1017/s0022112008004916
    [21]
    JELLY T O, JUNG S Y, ZAKI T A. Turbulence and skin friction modification in channel flow with streamwise-aligned superhydrophobic surface texture[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2014, 26(9): 095102. doi: 10.1063/1.4894064
    [22]
    MIN T, KIM J. Effects of hydrophobic surface on skin-friction drag[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(7): L55–L58. doi: 10.1063/1.1755723
    [23]
    SEO J, GARCÍA-MAYORAL R, MANI A. Pressure fluctuations and interfacial robustness in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 783: 448–473. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.573
    [24]
    BUSSE A, SANDHAM N D. Influence of an anisotropic slip-length boundary condition on turbulent channel flow[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24(5): 055111. doi: 10.1063/1.4719780
    [25]
    CLAUSER F H. The turbulent boundary layer[M]//Advances in Applied Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1956: 1-51. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2156(08)70370-3
    [26]
    WEI T, SCHMIDT R, MCMURTRY P. Comment on the Clauser chart method for determining the friction velocity[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2005, 38(5): 695–699. doi: 10.1007/s00348-005-0934-3
    [27]
    ROBINSON S K. Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 23: 601–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.003125
    [28]
    ZHOU J, ADRIAN R J, BALACHANDAR S, et al. Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 387: 353–396. doi: 10.1017/s002211209900467x
    [29]
    DENG S C, PAN C, WANG J J, et al. On the spatial organization of hairpin packets in a turbulent boundary layer at low-to-moderate Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 844: 635–668. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2018.160
    [30]
    BERKOOZ G, HOLMES P, LUMLEY J L. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 25: 539–575. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543
    [31]
    MARUSIC I, MONTY J P. Attached eddy model of wall turbulence[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51: 49–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040427
    [32]
    MOIN P. Revisiting Taylor’s hypothesis[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 640: 1–4. doi: 10.1017/s0022112009992126
    [33]
    KROGSTAD P Å, KASPERSEN J H, RIMESTAD S. Convection velocities in a turbulent boundary layer[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1998, 10(4): 949–957. doi: 10.1063/1.869617
    [34]
    DENNIS D J C, NICKELS T B. On the limitations of Taylor’s hypothesis in constructing long structures in a turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 614: 197–206. doi: 10.1017/s0022112008003352
  • Related Articles

    [1]GONG Xuechun, WANG Feng, XI Hengdong, XU Haitao. Effects of the spatial resolution of planar PIV on measured turbulence multi-point statistics[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(4): 44-57. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20240002
    [2]LIANG Zhi, HU Fei, SHI Yu, ZHANG Zhe, LIU Lei. Research of mast shadow effect on the average wind speed and turbulence intensity by field experiment[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(2): 88-97. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20220010
    [3]LIU Zhaoyang, WANG Xinwei, WANG Xuan, LI Biaohui, WANG Yufei, JIANG Nan. Experimental study of the mechanism of drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers on the superhydrophobic structured wall with microstructure[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20220016
    [4]WANG Xuan, FAN Ziye, CHEN Letian, TANG Zhanqi, JIANG Nan. Experimental study of TRPIV for turbulent boundary layer of longitudinal concave curvature wall[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 36(6): 1-9. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210084
    [5]Liu Tiefeng, Wang Xinwei, Tang Zhanqi, Jiang Nan. TRPIV experimental study of the effect of superhydrophobic surface on the coherent structure of turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(3): 90-96. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20180101
    [6]Ding Cunwei, Li Zhoufu, Zhang Xue, Zhou Guocheng. Research on microphone phase array design based on surrogate model[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(4): 93-98, 103. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170151
    [7]Wang Yong, Hao Nansong, Geng Zihai, Wang Wanbo. Measurements of circular cylinder's wake using time-resolved PIV[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(1): 64-70. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170099
    [8]Bai Jianxia, Zheng Xiaobo, Jiang Nan. Phase-averaging waveforms of superstructures in outer layer of turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20160064
    [9]GUO Ai-dong, JIANG Nan, JIA Yong-xia. Measurement of phase difference for eddy viscosity model equation of turbulence[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 25(4): 1-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.04.001
    [10]ZHENG Long-xi, YAN Chuan-jun, FAN Wei, LI Mu, WANG Zhi-wu. Calculation and experimental investigation on average thrust characteristics of a model pulse detonation engine[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 19(3): 61-66. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2005.03.013
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 郭沛洋,张毅,张梦卓,胡海豹. 亲水-超疏水相间表面通气减阻实验研究. 力学学报. 2024(01): 94-100 .
    2. 秦立果,刘建波,李航,卢山,马泽宇,王征,董光能. 水下湍流减阻技术研究进展. 表面技术. 2024(16): 1-18 .
    3. 张春来,张丽霞,王潇,吴银涛,王波. 沟槽型微纳复合结构表面的制备与减阻性能研究. 材料导报. 2023(12): 239-243 .
    4. 张奕,潘翀,窦建宇,张淼. 微型涡流发生器影响下的湍流边界层流场与摩阻特性. 实验流体力学. 2023(04): 48-58 . 本站查看
    5. 李茂林,张浩,玄克勇,石若冉,张志. 壁面微沟槽减阻技术研究进展. 煤气与热力. 2023(10): 12-19 .
    6. 李炳炘,张浩,玄克勇,孙国梁. 微沟槽减阻技术研究现状与进展综述. 煤气与热力. 2023(12): 21-27 .
    7. 罗忠,刘凯,周欣,胡俊波. 水下目标壳体复合涂层阻力试验. 船舶工程. 2022(09): 147-151 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (299) PDF downloads (40) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close