Research on semiconductor strain gage balance technology applied in shock tunnel

HUANG Jun; QIU Huacheng; LIU Shiran; ZHAO Rongjuan; LYU Zhiguo; YANG Yanguang

doi:10.11729/syltlx20190122

Volume 34 Issue 6

Dec. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics > 2020 > 34(6): 79-85. > DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20190122

HUANG Jun, QIU Huacheng, LIU Shiran, ZHAO Rongjuan, LYU Zhiguo, YANG Yanguang. Research on semiconductor strain gage balance technology applied in shock tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(6): 79-85. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20190122

Citation:

PDF (8678 KB)

Research on semiconductor strain gage balance technology applied in shock tunnel

Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute of China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang Sichuan 621000, China

More Information

Received Date: September 26, 2019
Revised Date: December 26, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The conventional strain balance or piezoelectric balance cannot meet the requirements of high precision aerodynamic measurement in the shock tunnel, as the effective test time is very short. The strain sensitivity of the semiconductor strain gage is much higher than that of the foil strain gage, but its temperature coefficient is two orders of magnitude greater than that of the foil strain gage. This paper designed a temperature-self-compensation semiconductor strain gage, and applied it on equal strength beam experiments. The results show that the temperature self-compensation technology can effectively improve the temperature effect of the semiconductor strain gage, and the temperature drift of the semiconductor strain gage is reduced down to 0.2% FS after temperature compensation. In this paper, a six-components balance with high frequency response is designed for the shock tunnel, and the results of calibration show that the combining loading repeatability and combining loading error of the balance meet the requirements of the national military standards. The balance can acquire more than one signal during effective test time as the inherent frequency of the test system is more than 100 Hz, and the results of the shock tunnel test are in good agreement with reference values of the aerodynamic manual and CFD results.
- semiconductor strain gage,
- temperature self-compensation,
- shock tunnel,
- calibration,
- aerodynamic measurement

FullText(HTML)

References (22)

References

[1]	小约翰·D.安德森.空气动力学基础[M].杨永, 宋文萍, 张正科, 等译注. 5版.北京: 航空工业出版社, 2014.
[2]	唐志共, 许晓斌, 杨彦广, 等.高超声速风洞气动力试验技术进展[J].航空学报, 2015, 36(1):86-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201501007.htm TANG Z G, XU X B, YANG Y G, et al. Research progress on hypersonic wind tunnel aerodynamic testing techniques[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):86-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201501007.htm
[3]	LIU Y F, WANG Y P, YUAN C K, et al. Aerodynamic force and moment measurement of 10° half-angle cone in JF12 shock tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(3):983-987. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.02.008
[4]	WANG Y P, LIU Y F, LUO C T, et al. Force test in a large-scale shock tunnel[C]//Proc of the 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 2017.
[5]	WANG Y P, LIU Y F, JIANG Z L. Design of a pulse-type strain gauge balance for a long-test-duration hypersonic shock tunnel[J]. Shock Waves, 2016, 26(6):835-844. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-015-0616-x
[6]	MENG B Q, HAN G L, ZHANG D L, et al. Aerodynamic measurement of a large aircraft model in hypersonic flow[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2017, 26(11):114702. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/11/114702
[7]	DURYEA G R, MARTIN J F. An improved piezoelectric balance for aerodynamic force[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1968, AES-4(3):351-359. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.1968.5408988
[8]	吕治国, 刘洪山, 齐学群, 等.飞船返回舱再入阶段高超声速六分量测力试验研究[J].空气动力学学报, 2003, 21(3):282-287. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2003.03.004 LYU Z G, LIU H S, QI X Q, et al. Experiment study of hypersonic six-component force measurement for re-entry module in shock tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2003, 21(3):282-287. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2003.03.004
[9]	SHEERAN W J, DURYEA G R. The application of the accelerometer force balance in short-duration testing[C]//Proc of the 4th Aerodynamic Testing Conference. 1969.
[10]	MENEZES V, KUMAR S, MARUTA K, et al. Hypersonic flow over a multi-step afterbody[J]. Shock Waves, 2005, 14(5-6):421-424. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-005-0281-6
[11]	SINGH P, MENEZES V, IRIMPAN K J, et al. Impulse force balance for ultrashort duration hypersonic test facilities[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 2015:803253.
[12]	SAHOO N, MAHAPATRA D R, JAGADEESH G, et al. An accelerometer balance system for measurement of aerodynamic force coefficients over blunt bodies in a hypersonic shock tunnel[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2003, 14(3):260-272. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/14/3/303
[13]	SANDERSON S R, SIMMONS J M. Drag balance for hypervelocity impulse facilities[J]. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29(12):2185-2191. DOI: 10.2514/3.10858
[14]	ROBINSON M J, MEE D J, TSAI C Y, et al. Three-component force measurements on a large scramjet in a shock tunnel[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2004, 41(3):416-425. DOI: 10.2514/1.10699
[15]	MEE D J, DANIEL W J T, SIMMONS J M. Three-component force balance for flows of millisecond duration[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(3):590-595. DOI: 10.2514/3.13108
[16]	刘施然, 杨赟秀, 胡守超, 等.脉冲风洞单分量应力波天平测力技术[J].宇航学报, 2016, 37(12):1419-1424. DOI: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2016.12.003 LIU S R, YANG Y X, HU S C, et al. Stress wave force balance for use in hypersonic impulse facilities[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37(12):1419-1424. DOI: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2016.12.003
[17]	WACKER N, RICHTER H. Piezoresistive effect in MOSFETS[M]//BURGHARTZ J N. Ultra-thin chip technology and applications. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 2011.
[18]	WATSON R B. Bonded electrical resistance strain gages[M]//SHARPE W N Jr. Springer handbook of experimental solid mechanics. Boston: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[19]	DOLL J C, PRUITT B L. Piezoresistor design and applications[M]. New York:Springer Science+Business Media, 2013.
[20]	BARLIAN A A, PARK W T, MALLON J R, et al. Review:semiconductor piezoresistance for microsystems[J]. Proceed-ings of the IEEE, 2009, 97(3):513-552. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2013612
[21]	国防科学技术工业委员会. GJB2244A-94风洞应变天平规范[S]. 1994.
[22]	航天部第十四研究所.无粘气动力手册[M].北京:航天部第十四研究所, 1984.

[1]	DU Baihe, ZHANG Songhe, GE Qiang, WANG Maogang. Study on flow field characteristics of inert gas-air hybrid arc[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 36(5): 69-75. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210052
[2]	ZHANG Xinghuan, ZHANG Pingtao, PENG Bo, YI Xian. Prediction of icing wind tunnel temperature field with machine learning[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 36(5): 8-15. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210196
[3]	Fu Cheng, Zhao Bo, Xu Dachuan, Liao Daxiong, Pei Haitao, Zhu Bo, Qin Honggang. Investigation on flow turbulent characteristics of plate-fin and tube-fin heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(6): 22-27. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20190036
[4]	Wang Feng, Xu Jinglei, Wang Yangsheng. Study of flow field characteristics of an over-under TBCC exhaust system during mode transition process[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(3): 68-75. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20190037
[5]	Gong Jishuang, Zhou Lin, Zhang Yining, Teng Honghui. Investigation on flow field structure of rotating detonation using the method of characteristics[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(1): 89-96. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20180072
[6]	Liao Daxiong, Chen Jiming, Zheng Juan, Chen Qin, Pei Haitao, Wu Shenghao. General performance of 0.6m continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(6): 88-93. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170086
[7]	Yang Hong, Luo Yue, Wu Dong, Zhou Ping. Study on supersonic turbulence plate ablation flow field in arc heater[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(4): 72-77. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170181
[8]	Yu Mingxing, Bai Shuxin, Xu Xiaoliang, Cao Zhanwei. Research on method for evaluating the thermal protective performance of non-catalysis material in non-equilibrium flow[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(4): 84-89. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170084
[9]	Luo Yue, Zhou Wei, Yang Hong, Chen Wei. CFD analysis of the arc heater turbulent flow field of flat plate testing[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(2): 86-92. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20160088
[10]	Yang Bo, Liu Sen. Investigation of the performance of flow field in supersonic/hypersonic wind tunnel with different test section geometry configurations[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2014, (4): 59-64. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20130023

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

1.	韩笑，高创，郑怡彤，刘小兵. 切角凹槽矩形截面桥塔的气动特性试验研究. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 9-15+23 .
2.	白桦，刘博祥，姬乃川，李加武. 节段模型二元端板合理尺寸估算方法. 振动与冲击. 2023(02): 312-320 .
3.	王仰雪，刘庆宽，靖洪淼，李震，孙一飞. 倾斜栏杆对流线型箱梁涡激振动性能影响的试验研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(06): 232-239+254 .
4.	于畅，仇法梅，田学东，杨群，刘小兵. 圆角矩形柱平均气动力特性的雷诺数效应试验研究. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 29-34 .
5.	杨群，于畅，刘小兵，刘庆宽. 不同圆角率的方形断面斯特罗哈数的雷诺数效应研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(11): 223-231 .
6.	刘庆宽，王仰雪，孙一飞，李震，韩原，靖洪淼. 栏杆高度对流线型箱梁涡振性能影响的试验研究. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(07): 140-150 .
7.	刘路路，杨皓然，邹云峰，何旭辉，韩艳，陈志强. 公铁同层双幅非对称主梁气动干扰特性研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(10): 3861-3872 .
8.	杨群，于畅，于文文，刘小兵. 圆角方柱气动特性的风洞试验研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(24): 59-68 .
9.	韩振，李波，甄伟，杨庆山，田玉基. 宽厚比为5的超高层建筑风荷载特性研究. 哈尔滨工程大学学报. 2022(02): 196-202 .
10.	张庆华，马文勇，杨杰，张彦，周帅伟. 不同风倾角下典型等边角钢静风力风洞试验研究. 振动工程学报. 2022(02): 277-283 .
11.	白桦，王涵，姬乃川，李加武. 节段模型长宽比对风洞测力试验及计算分析的影响. 中国公路学报. 2022(08): 202-212 .
12.	杨群，刘庆宽，韩瑞，刘小兵. 不同圆角率的方形断面气动特性的雷诺数效应. 振动与冲击. 2020(04): 150-156 .
13.	沈国辉，姚剑锋，郭勇，邢月龙，楼文娟. 直径30 cm圆柱的气动力参数和绕流特性研究. 振动与冲击. 2020(06): 22-28 .
14.	温青，池俊豪，华旭刚，王修勇，孙洪鑫. 端部条件和展弦比对矩形断面节段模型气动力特征的影响. 实验流体力学. 2020(04): 36-43 . 本站查看
15.	任若松，梁新华，刘小兵，马文勇，刘庆宽. 准流线型桥梁断面气动力特性的雷诺数效应研究. 工程力学. 2020(S1): 139-144+167 .
16.	李海飞，梁新华，孙一飞，崔会敏，刘庆宽. 流线型桥梁断面表面脉动风荷载特性研究. 工程力学. 2020(S1): 242-248+260 .
17.	马文勇，汪冠亚，郑熙，陈铁，李智，张程远，方平治. 端部状态对斜置圆柱气动力分布的影响. 实验流体力学. 2019(02): 43-50 . 本站查看
31.	杨群，刘庆宽，孙亚松，刘小兵. 圆角方形断面气动特性试验. 振动.测试与诊断. 2020(01): 140-147+208 .

Other cited types(16)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (237) PDF downloads (24) Cited by(34)

Research on semiconductor strain gage balance technology applied in shock tunnel

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

Other cited types(16)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Research on semiconductor strain gage balance technology applied in shock tunnel

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

Other cited types(16)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content