MA L C,SHI Y J,HUANG B X,et al. Vacuum mode debugging and flow field performance calibration of large-scale hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022,36(1):96-102.. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210152
Citation: MA L C,SHI Y J,HUANG B X,et al. Vacuum mode debugging and flow field performance calibration of large-scale hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022,36(1):96-102.. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210152

Vacuum mode debugging and flow field performance calibration of large-scale hypersonic wind tunnel

More Information
  • Received Date: October 21, 2021
  • Revised Date: December 15, 2021
  • Accepted Date: December 21, 2021
  • Available Online: March 01, 2022
  • With the continuous increase of the flight altitude of advanced aircraft in the future, the requirements for wind tunnel test simulation ability are constantly increasing, such as the lower vacuum running ability. The conventional multistage ejection system can no longer fully meet the operation requirements. In order to improve the height simulation range of the wind tunnel test, CAAA designed a vacuum exhaust branch based on the original equipment of its newly built Ф1.2 m hypersonic wind tunnel to realize the pressure vacuum mode operation of the wind tunnel. The wind tunnel system debugging and testing results show that after the wind tunnel capacity is improved, each subsystem works normally and the system performance reaches the design target, and the hypersonic flow field condition at the altitude above 40 km with Mach number 5–8 is realized. The flow field index in the uniform area of the test section meets the relevant requirements of the aerodynamic test of the National military standard GJB 4399-2002. It provides a test platform for the study of aerodynamic characteristics of aircraft and complex hypersonic flow at high altitude.
  • [1]
    唐志共, 邓建平, 王志坚. CARDC新的Φ1米高超声速风洞[C]// 中国空气动力学会高超声速前沿问题研讨会论文集. 2002.
    [2]
    许晓斌. 常规高超声速风洞与试验技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2015.
    [3]
    陈勤学. 国外0.5米~1.5米常规高超声速风洞调查[J]. 气动研究与发展,2001,11(3):1-8.

    CHEN Q X. Survey of 0.5 m–1.5 m foreign conventional hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Aerodynamics Research and Development,2001,11(3):1-8.
    [4]
    SEKINE H, HIRABAYASHI N, KOYAMA T, et al. Mach number calibration on Mach 5 and 7 nozzles of 0.5 m Hypersonic Wind Tunnel[R]. JAXA-RR-05-043, 2006.
    [5]
    孙勇堂, 赵之平, 石运军, 等. CAAA新建Φ1.2米常规高超声速风洞[C]// 中国力学大会–2017暨庆祝中国力学学会成立60周年大会论文集(B). 2017.
    [6]
    周勇为,易仕和,程忠宇. Φ200高超声速风洞调试和流场校测[J]. 国防科技大学学报,2009,31(6):57-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2009.06.011

    ZHOU Y W,YI S H,CHENG Z Y. The test and calibration of Φ200 hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology,2009,31(6):57-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2009.06.011
    [7]
    马利川, 石运军, 黄炳修, 等. 大型高超声速风洞超低来流总压调节系统及应用[C]//第十一届全国流体力学学术会议论文摘要集. 2020: 573.
    [8]
    路波. 高速风洞测力试验数据处理方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014.
    [9]
    张涵信. 高超声速气动力试验[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2004.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YANG Jian, XU Jiao, ZHAO Chenxi, HAO Wenchang, YIN Yugang, ZHANG Shiming. Research on the fabrication and performance of ohmic contact of SiC piezoresistive pressure sensor[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(6): 93-98. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20230055
    [2]LEI Pengfei, ZHOU Enmin, HU Yunhua. Experiment of aerodynamic performance of axial compressor at low Reynolds number condition[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(6): 48-55. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20220026
    [3]SONG Jiayuan, LI Tian, ZHANG Jiye. Research on aerodynamic characteristics of evacuated tube train in dynamic operation[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37(1): 64-71. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20220121
    [4]DENG Haodong, XIA Tianyu, DONG Hao, CHENG Keming. Experimental study on the effect of rough surface on aerodynamic characteristics and flow field of low Reynolds number airfoil[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20230032
    [5]CHEN Aiguo, TIAN Ying, WANG Jie, YANG Yanguang, LI Zhihui, LI Zhonghua, LI Zhenqian. Measurement investigation of rotational temperature and vibrational temperature in hypersonic wind tunnel rarefied flow field[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210192
    [6]Liao Daxiong, Chen Jiming, Zheng Juan, Chen Qin, Pei Haitao, Wu Shenghao. General performance of 0.6m continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(6): 88-93. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170086
    [7]Guo Xiaoguo, Jiang Zepeng, Chen Xing, Wang Tiejin. Experimental investigation on aerodynamic performance of hypersonic wind tunnel two-stage ejector[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(4): 99-103. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170041
    [8]Xiong Bo, Cheng Song, Luo Xinfu, Zhou Enmin. Effects of low Reynolds number on performance of 0.6m continuous wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(1): 87-92,99. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20160079
    [9]Liu Qingkuan, Shao Qi, Zheng Yunfei, Li Conghui, Ma Wenyong, Liu Xiaobing. Experimental study on Reynolds number effect on aerodynamic pressure and forces of cylinder[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(4): 7-13. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20150112
    [10]HE Yuan-yuan, NI Hong-li, ZHENG Zhong-hua. Study of aerodynamic performance for integrated hypersonic vehicle's scaled model in the nonuniform flow fields of wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 24(4): 44-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2010.04.010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 杨路,辛煜. 吸气式高超声速飞行器气动外流场环境仿真及分析. 空天预警研究学报. 2024(06): 443-452 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1561) PDF downloads (81) Cited by(2)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close