Wang Peng, Jin Xin, Zhang Weimin, Yue Caiqian. Calibration for the FADS system applied to the vehicle with blunt fore-bodies[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(2): 97-102. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20150092
Citation: Wang Peng, Jin Xin, Zhang Weimin, Yue Caiqian. Calibration for the FADS system applied to the vehicle with blunt fore-bodies[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(2): 97-102. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20150092

Calibration for the FADS system applied to the vehicle with blunt fore-bodies

More Information
  • Based on the wind tunnel pressure data of a l/7-scale model of the F-14 airplane, three parameters of the FADS (Flush Air Data Sensing System,FADS)system,the angle-of-at-tack flow correction angle,the angle-of-sideslip flow correction angle,and the shape and com-pressibility parameter,were calibrated for applying to the vehicle with blunt fore-bodies.The wind-tunnel test Mach numbers were 0.73,0.90,1.05,1.20,and 1.39.Angles of attack were varied in 2°increments from -4°to 20°.Sideslip angles were varied in 2°increments from -8 ° to 8°.The calibration results show that different pressure points have great influence on the cali-bration of the angle-of-attack flow correction angle and the angle-of-sideslip flow correction angle based on the triple algorithm.And the best calibration results can be determined by the pressure points in a symmetrical configuration about the stagnation pressure point.And the calibration for the angle-of-attack flow correction angle is independent of the calibration for the angle-of-sideslip flow correction angle.As to the shape and compressibility parameter,it is related to the effective angle of attack,the effective angle of sideslip,the Mach number,the vehicle shape and other sys-tem factors.With the Mach number increases,the value of the shape and compressibility param-eter tends to zero .
  • Related Articles

    [1]HUANG Ganglei, ZHANG Zhenhui, Li Zhiyuan, TU Guohua, YUAN Xianxu, WU Jie, WANG Xichao, WU Di. Mach 6 freestream calibration of Φ0.6 m low-level-noise experimental platform and measurement of instability waves of sharp cone[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20240031
    [2]MA Lichuan, SHI Yunjun, HUANG Bingxiu, SUN Yongtang, YAN Shuo. Vacuum mode debugging and flow field performance calibration of large-scale hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 36(1): 96-102. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20210152
    [3]Wang Zixu, Shen Hao, Guo Long, Guo Xiangdong, Ni Zhangsong. Cloud calibration method of 3m×2m icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(2): 61-67. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20170163
    [4]Luo Yue, Zhou Wei, Yang Hong, Chen Wei. CFD analysis of the arc heater turbulent flow field of flat plate testing[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(2): 86-92. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20160088
    [5]Ma Husheng, Liu Huilong, Qin Tianchao, Du Wei, Shi Peijie, Ren Siyuan. Development of hot-wire probe calibration wind tunnel based on compressible fluid[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(1): 93-99. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20160108
    [6]Yang Bo, Liu Sen. Investigation of the performance of flow field in supersonic/hypersonic wind tunnel with different test section geometry configurations[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2014, (4): 59-64. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20130023
    [7]CHEN De-hua, WANG Rui-bo, LIU Guang-yuan, SHI Jian-yuan, YIN Lu-ping. The test and flow field calibration of 2.4m transonic wind tunnel slotted test section[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(4): 66-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.04.012
    [8]HE Yuan-yuan, NI Hong-li, ZHENG Zhong-hua. Study of aerodynamic performance for integrated hypersonic vehicle's scaled model in the nonuniform flow fields of wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 24(4): 44-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2010.04.010
    [9]XU Xiang, CHENG Ke-ming, WANG Zhi-jian, XU Yun. Flow field calibration of NUAA Φ0.5m hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 23(4): 77-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2009.04.016
    [10]LI Yan, WANG Hai-wen, GUO Hui. Application of Pitot-tube method in the flow field calibrations of low speed water tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 23(3): 104-107,112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2009.03.022
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 胡喆,张军,倪章松,苏文,许德军,黄丹. 磁浮飞行风洞动模型系统振动特性仿真研究. 振动与冲击. 2025(02): 143-150+198 .
    2. 聂少军,汪运鹏,王春,姜宗林. 激波风洞测力信号的频域数据深度学习建模分析方法. 振动与冲击. 2023(13): 296-302+315 .
    3. 聂少军,汪运鹏. 基于时频变换的激波风洞天平信号分析与处理. 力学学报. 2022(01): 232-243 .
    4. 王南天,王雄,孙鹏,许晓斌,邹琼芬. 连续变迎角试验数据自适应分段拟合滤波方法. 北京航空航天大学学报. 2021(06): 1145-1151 .
    5. 聂少军,王粤,汪运鹏,赵敏,隋婧. 循环神经网络在智能天平研究中的应用. 力学学报. 2021(08): 2336-2344 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (164) PDF downloads (9) Cited by(8)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close