Experimental study on the effect of rough surface on aerodynamic characteristics and flow field of low Reynolds number airfoil

DENG Haodong; XIA Tianyu; DONG Hao; CHENG Keming

doi:10.11729/syltlx20230032

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics > 2023 > Accepted Manuscript

DENG H D, XIA T Y, DONG H, et al. Experimental study on the effect of rough surface on aerodynamic characteristics and flow field of low Reynolds number airfoil[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230032

Citation:

PDF( 17705 KB)

Experimental study on the effect of rough surface on aerodynamic characteristics and flow field of low Reynolds number airfoil

doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230032

DENG Haodong^1
,,
XIA Tianyu¹,
DONG Hao^{1, 2
,
,},
CHENG Keming^{1, 2}

1.
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing　210016, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Aerospace Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing　210016, China

Received Date: 2023-03-13
Accepted Date: 2023-05-15
Rev Recd Date: 2023-05-11

Available Online: 2023-06-02

Abstract

Abstract

In order to explore the influence of rough surfaces on aerodynamic characteristics and the flow field of the low Reynolds number airfoil and to deeply understand the action mechanism of rough surfaces, the SD8020 airfoil was used for experimental research (Re = 4 × 10⁴). The aerodynamic force of the airfoil was measured in the experiment, and the flow field around the airfoil was observed in detail by using luminescent oil-film, smoke wire flow visualization and hot wire technology. The results show that the lift coefficient of the smooth airfoil has nonlinear characteristics in the range of α = 0°～3°, and the abrupt change of the laminar flow separation bubble structure is the main reason for the nonlinear characteristics of the lift coefficient of the airfoil at low Reynolds number. Too small leading edge roughness (S_a⁺ = 0.00025) does not have significant influence on the flow field, but appropriate leading edge roughness (S_a⁺ = 0.0051, 0.013) can delay the separation of boundary layer, accelerate the reattachment of shear layer, and reduce or even eliminate laminar separation bubbles. So it can significantly reduce aerodynamic drag and increase the lift-drag ratio. The lift-drag ratio of the smooth airfoil is increased by 35.7% and 41.4%, respectively. When S_a⁺=0.013, the nonlinear characteristics of the lift coefficient growth is weakened at a small attack angle and the lift coefficient can increase significantly (e. g. the lift coefficient increases by 219.5% when α=2°). The roughness of the leading edge accelerates the growth of the disturbance (manifested as the growth of high-frequency velocity pulsation and T–S wave), rolls the vorticity of the wall into the flow field faster, and forms the vortex structure earlier. The vortex structure can strengthen the normal convection, improve the resistance of the boundary layer to the adverse pressure gradient, and delay the separation. After the boundary layer separation, the vortex structure plays a leading role in the transition process of the separated shear layer, speeding up the transition of flow to turbulence and flow reattachment in advance.
- low Reynolds number,
- laminar separation bubble,
- boundary layer transition,
- rough surface,
- Λ vortex,
- aerodynamic characteristics,
- airfoil

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	McMICHAEL C M S F, JAMES M. Micro air vehicles—toward a new dimension in flight[R]. US DAPPA/TTO Report, 1997.
[2]	SHYY W, LIAN Y, TANG J, et al. Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number flyers[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[3]	MUELLER T J, DeLAURIER J D. Aerodynamics of small vehicles[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 35: 89–111. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161102
[4]	FENG L, WEN S. Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of micro air vehicles[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(2): 257–268.
[5]	BONS J P. A review of surface roughness effects in gas turbines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2): 021004. doi: 10.1115/1.3066315
[6]	SERDAR GENÇ M, KOCA K, AÇIKEL H H. Investigation of pre-stall flow control on wind turbine blade airfoil using roughness element[J]. Energy, 2019, 176: 320–334. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.179
[7]	ZHOU Y, WANG Z J. Effect of surface roughness on laminar separation bubble over a wing at a low-Reynolds number[C]//Proc of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2011: 736. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-736
[8]	JABBARI H, ALI E, DJAVARESHKIAN M H. Acoustic and phase portrait analysis of leading-edge roughness element on laminar separation bubbles at low Reynolds number flow[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2022, 236(9): 1782–1798. doi: 10.1177/09544100211044316
[9]	GROSS A, FASEL H F. Numerical investigation of passive separation control for an airfoil at low-Reynolds-number conditions[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(7): 1553–1565. doi: 10.2514/1.J051553
[10]	JOSEPH L A, FENOUIL J, BORGOLTZ A, et al. Aerodynamic effects of roughness on wind turbine blade sections[C]//Proc of the 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. 2015: 3384. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-3384
[11]	RAMSAY R F, HOFFMAN M J, GREGOREK G M. Effects of grit roughness and pitch oscillations on the S809 airfoil[R]. NREL/TP-442-7817, 1995. doi: 10.2172/205563
[12]	CHAKROUN W, AL-MESRI I, AL-FAHAD S. Effect of surface roughness on the aerodynamic characteristics of a symmetrical airfoil[J]. Wind Engineering, 2004, 28(5): 547–564. doi: 10.1260/0309524043028136
[13]	ZHANG Y, IGARASHI T, HU H. Experimental investiga-tions on the performance degradation of a low-Reynolds-number airfoil with distributed leading edge roughness[C]//Proc of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2011: 1102. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-1102
[14]	LIU T S, SULLIVAN J P. Luminescent oil-film skin-friction meter[J]. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(8): 1460–1465. doi: 10.2514/2.538
[15]	LIU T S. Global skin friction measurements and interpre-tation[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 111: 100584. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.100584
[16]	LEE T J, LEE C I, NONOMURA T, et al. Unsteady skin-friction field estimation based on global luminescent oil-film image analysis[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2020, 23(5): 763–772. doi: 10.1007/s12650-020-00661-y
[17]	李周复. 风洞试验手册[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2015.
[18]	SELIG M S, GUGLIELMO J J, BROERN A P, et al. Experiments on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers[C]//Proc of the 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition. 1996: 62. doi: 10.2514/6.1996-62
[19]	白鹏, 李锋, 詹慧玲, 等. 翼型低Re数小攻角非线性非定常层流分离现象研究[J]. 中国科学 (物理学力学天文学), 2015, 45(2): 41–52. BAI P, LI F, ZHAN H L, et al. Study on nonlinear unsteady laminar separation phenomenon of airfoil with low Re number and small angle of attack[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 2015, 45(2): 41–52.
[20]	YARUSEVYCH S, SULLIVAN P E, KAWALL J G. On vortex shedding from an airfoil in low-Reynolds-number flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 632: 245–271. doi: 10.1017/s0022112009007058
[21]	LIU C Q, YAN Y H, LU P. Physics of turbulence generation and sustenance in a boundary layer[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2014, 102: 353–384. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.06.032