Analysis on the aerodynamic noise of the pantograph of high-speed train at 400 km/h

SUN Shu; ZHANG Wenmin; JIA Shangshuai

doi:10.11729/syltlx20230029

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics > 2024 > Accepted Manuscript

SUN S, ZHANG W M, JIA S S. Analysis on the aerodynamic noise of the pantograph of high-speed train at 400 km/h[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(1): 1-8 doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230029

Citation:

PDF( 8070 KB)

Analysis on the aerodynamic noise of the pantograph of high-speed train at 400 km/h

doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230029

1.
College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology , Tangshan　063210, China
2.
Technology Research Center of CRRC Tangshan Co., LTD., Tangshan　063035, China

Received Date: 2023-03-13
Accepted Date: 2023-06-15
Rev Recd Date: 2023-06-08

Available Online: 2023-10-08

Abstract

Abstract

In order to clarify the aerodynamic noise characteristics of the high-speed train pantograph system and its relationship with the flow field, a subdomain model of the full size and a scale model of the pantograph were established, and large eddy simulation, acoustic perturbation equation and FW–H equation were used to predict the flow field and sound field under the condition of rising bow at 400 km/h. Based on the FW–H equation, the sound source distribution was inverted, and the energy distribution of the turbulent pressure and sound pressure in the pantograph base were analyzed using the reduced order model. The results show that with the incoming flow velocity of 400 km/h and the pantograph as the sound source, the total sound pressure level of P2, which is the standard measuring point in the far field can reach 88.1 dB(A), and there are obvious peaks around 283 Hz and 576 Hz. The Strouhal number corresponding to the peak frequency (characteristic length is 41 mm equivalent diameter of the square rod) is 0.10 and 0.21, respectively. The energy ratio of the first two modes of the turbulent pressure and sound pressure in the pantograph base are 4.5% and 3.3%, 40.9% and 14.0%, respectively, with certain symmetry in the distribution. For the pantograph base, in the frequency band below 300 Hz, the pressure level of the full-size model is larger than that of the scale model, and in the frequency band below 1000 Hz, the sound pressure level of the full-size model is larger than that of the scale model. When the whole pantograph is used as the sound source to radiate to the far-field standard point, the measured sound pressure level of the full-size model is larger than that of the scale model at all frequencies.
- high-speed train,
- pantograph,
- aerodynamic noise,
- large eddy simulation,
- acoustic perturbation equation,
- 400 kilometers per hour

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	中国国家铁路集团有限公司. 中国高铁运营里程突破4万公里, 铁路运营总里程超15万公里[EB/OL]. (2022-01-01)[2023-03-13].http://www.china-railway.com.cn/xwzx/zhxw/202201/t20220101_119181.html.
[2]	刘加利, 于梦阁, 田爱琴, 等. 高速列车受电弓气动噪声特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 231–237. doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.04.231 LIU J L, YU M G, TIAN A Q, et al. Study on the aerodynamic noise characteristics of the pantograph of the high-speed train[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(4): 231–237. doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.04.231
[3]	袁贤浦, 苗晓丹, 袁天辰, 等. 高速列车受电弓气动噪声分析与弓头降噪研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2021, 43(12): 38–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2021.12.005 YUAN X P, MIAO X D, YUAN T C, et al. Aerodynamic noise analysis of high-speed train pantograph and study on noise reduction of pantograph head[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2021, 43(12): 38–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2021.12.005
[4]	史佳伟, 葛帅, 圣小珍. 受电弓舱对受电弓区域气动噪声的影响[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(23): 216–222. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2021.23.029 SHI J W, GE S, SHENG X Z. Effects of pantograph recess on aerodynamic noise in pantograph area[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(23): 216–222. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2021.23.029
[5]	KIM H, HU Z W, THOMPSON D. Numerical investigation of the effect of cavity flow on high speed train pantograph aerodynamic noise[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 201: 104159. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104159
[6]	张亚东, 张继业. 受电弓安放位置与导流罩嵌入车体高低的气动噪声特性[J]. 铁道学报, 2020, 42(8): 60–67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2020.08.008 ZHANG Y D, ZHANG J Y. Aerodynamic noise characteristics of installation position of pantograph and fairing embedded into different height of vehicle[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2020, 42(8): 60–67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2020.08.008
[7]	姚永芳, 孙振旭, 刘文, 等. 高速列车受电弓气动噪声特性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(3): 385–398. doi: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2020.014 YAO Y F, SUN Z X, LIU W, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristics of pantograph in high speed train[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2020, 56(3): 385–398. doi: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2020.014
[8]	秦登, 戴志远, 周宁, 等. 受电弓下沉对其气动和声学行为的影响[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(20): 2509–2519. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2022.20.015 QIN D, DAI Z Y, ZHOU N, et al. Effects of pantograph subsidence on its aerodynamic and acoustic behaviors[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 33(20): 2509–2519. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2022.20.015
[9]	张淑敏, 史佳伟, 圣小珍. 受电弓区域气动激励特性及其对车内噪声的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(3): 258–268. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.03.018 ZHANG S M, SHI J W, SHENG X Z. Aerodynamic excitation characteristics of pantograph area and their effects on interior noise[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(3): 258–268. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.03.018
[10]	LATORRE IGLESIAS E, THOMPSON D J, SMITH M G. Component-based model to predict aerodynamic noise from high-speed train pantographs[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 394: 280–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.01.028
[11]	LI Q L, LI Z M, OUYANG M H, et al. Coherence and reduced order analyses of flow field and aerodynamic noise for full-scale high-speed trains pantograph[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2022, 193: 108777. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108777
[12]	ZHAO Y Y, YANG Z G, LI Q L, et al. Analysis of the near-field and far-field sound pressure generated by high-speed trains pantograph system[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 169: 107506. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107506
[13]	MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598–1605. doi: 10.2514/3.12149
[14]	LESIEUR M, METAIS O. New trends in large-eddy simulations of turbulence[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 28: 45–82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.000401
[15]	WILLIAMS J E F, HAWKINGS D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1969, 264(1151): 321–342. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1969.0031
[16]	EWERT R, SCHRÖDER W. Acoustic perturbation equations based on flow decomposition via source filtering[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 188(2): 365–398. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00168-2
[17]	DARWISH M S, MOUKALLED F H. Normalized variable and space formulation methodology for high-resolution schemes[J]. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B:Fundamentals, 1994, 26(1): 79–96. doi: 10.1080/10407799408914918
[18]	CAZEMIER W, VERSTAPPEN R W C P, VELDMAN A E P. Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional models for driven cavity flows[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1998, 10(7): 1685–1699. doi: 10.1063/1.869686