Comparative analysis between thin-film gauges and ALTP sensors in shock tunnel tests

CHEN Suyu; LIU Jichun; YANG Kai; ZHU Tao; ZHU Xinxin; WANG Hui

doi:10.11729/syltlx20220036

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics > 2023 > Accepted Manuscript

CHEN S Y, LIU J C, YANG K, et al. Comparative analysis between thin-film gauges and ALTP sensors in shock tunnel tests[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220036

Citation:

CHEN S Y, LIU J C, YANG K, et al. Comparative analysis between thin-film gauges and ALTP sensors in shock tunnel tests[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220036

Citation:

CHEN S Y, LIU J C, YANG K, et al. Comparative analysis between thin-film gauges and ALTP sensors in shock tunnel tests[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220036

PDF( 6996 KB)

Comparative analysis between thin-film gauges and ALTP sensors in shock tunnel tests

doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220036

Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang　621000, China

Received Date: 2022-03-31
Accepted Date: 2022-06-07
Rev Recd Date: 2022-04-29

Available Online: 2023-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

In the shock tunnel tests, the main parameter to measure is the heat flux density, and the thin-film resistance gauges （TFRGs） are frequently used. As the uncertainty of the measured heat flux with TFRGs is relatively high resulting from the lack of direct validation method for TFRGs, the atomic layer thermopile （ALTP） heat-flux sensors are applied in shock tunnel tests for comparison with the TFRGs. ALTP sensors have a fast response time and a good linearity, and it can be used in a long duration to measure low heat flux density, which ensures that they can be easily calibrated with the high-accuracy light-based calibration device, so the transfer calibration method is established to on-line calibrate TFRGs in the shock tunnel tests. The experimental results confirm the stable measured heat flux with the ALTP sensors and the TFRGs in the different shock tunnel tests, and the difference between the two kinds of heat-flux sensors is less than 8%. Based on the discussion on the tracing chains of the transfer method for calibrating heat-flux sensors and the measured heat flux in tests, the comparison results show the potential that the ALTP heat-flux sensors can be used to on-line calibrate TFRGs in shock tunnel tests.
- heat flux density,
- thin-film resistance gauge,
- atomic layer thermopile （ALTP）,
- shock tunnel,
- on-line calibration

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	李强, 刘济春, 孔荣宗. 耐冲刷薄膜铂电阻热流传感器研制[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2017, 31(4): 623–629. doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.2017.04.019 LI Q, LIU J C, KONG R Z. Development of anti-erosion platinum thin film resistance thermal sensor[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2017, 31(4): 623–629. doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.2017.04.019
[2]	LU F K, KINNEAR K M. Characterization of thin-film heat-flux gauges[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 1999, 13(4): 548–549. doi: 10.2514/2.6477
[3]	LI J P, CHEN H, ZHANG S Z, et al. On the response of coaxial surface thermocouples for transient aerodynamic heating measurements[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 86: 141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.04.011
[4]	MANJHI S K, KUMAR R. Performance assessment of K-type, E-type and J-type coaxial thermocouples on the solar light beam for short duration transient measurements[J]. Measurement, 2019, 146: 343–355. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.035
[5]	张扣立, 周嘉穗, 孔荣宗, 等. CARDC激波风洞TSP技术研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2016, 34(6): 738–743. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0151 ZHANG K L, ZHOU J S, KONG R Z, et al. Development of TSP technique in shock tunnel of CARDC[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(6): 738–743. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0151
[6]	LIU X, SHAO H Y, ZHOU W W, et al. Apparent temperature in temperature-sensitive paint measurement and its effect on surface heat flux determination for hypersonic flows[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2020, 31(12): 125302. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ab9fd9
[7]	YANG K. A new calibration technique for thin-film gauges and coaxial thermocouples used to measure the transient heat flux[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 1–9. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3132064
[8]	王宏宇, 王辉, 石义雷, 等. 一种高超声速稀薄流激波干扰气动热测量技术[J]. 宇航学报, 41(12), 2020: 1525–1532. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2020.12.006 WANG H Y, WANG H, SHI Y L, et al. An aerothermodynamics measuring technique for shock interactions in hypersonic low-density flow[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 41(12), 2020: 1525–1532. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2020.12.006
[9]	刘初平. 气动热与热防护试验热流测量[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013. LIU C P. Measurement of heat flow in aerodynamic heat and thermal protection test[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013.
[10]	COOK W J, FELDERMAN E J. Reduction of data from thin-film heat-transfer gages - A concise numerical technique[J]. AIAA Journal, 1966, 4(3): 561–562. doi: 10.2514/3.3486
[11]	ASTM standard. Standard test method for measuring extreme heat-transfer rates from high-energy environments using a transient null-point calorimeter, ASTM E598-96[S]. Pennsylvania : ASTM International, 1996. doi: 10.1520/E0598-96
[12]	林键, 陈星, 王丹, 等. 柔性铂电阻传感器在舵缝热环境试验中的应用[J]. 气动研究与实验, 2021, 33(02): 91–97. doi: 10.12050/are20210209 LIN J, CHEN X, WANG D, et al. Application of flexible platinum sensor in aerothermal environment test of rudder gap[J]. Aerodynamic Research & Experiment, 2021, 33(02): 91–97. doi: 10.12050/are20210209
[13]	张宏安, 黄见洪, 秦峰, 等. 基于脉冲加热法的薄膜热流传感器热物性参数测量技术研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2018, 32(6): 74–78,93. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20170120 ZHANG H A, HUANG J H, QIN F, et al. Thermal property measuring techniques of thin-film heat flux sensors based on pulse-heating method[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(6): 74–78,93. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20170120
[14]	杨凯, 刘济春, 陈苏宇, 等. 薄膜热电阻热流传感器的对比标定结果及分析[J/OL]. 实验流体力学. [ 2022-05-16] 2022-05-16 YANG K, LIU J C, CHEN S Y, et al. Calibration results and analysis of thin-film gauges calibrated with the transfer method[J/OL]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics. [ 2022-05-16]doi: 10.11729/syltlx20210129
[15]	MURTHY A V, TSAI B K, GIBSON C E. Calibration of high heat flux sensors at NIST[J]. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1997, 102(4): 479–488. doi: 10.6028/jres.102.032
[16]	MURTHY A V, TSAI B K, SAUNDERS R D. Transfer calibration validation tests on a heat flux sensor in the 51 mm high-temperature blackbody[J]. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001, 106(5): 823–831. doi: 10.6028/jres.106.039
[17]	杨凯, 朱涛, 王雄, 等. 原子层热电堆热流传感器研制及其性能测试[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(6): 86–91. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20190148 YANG K, ZHU T, WANG X, et al. Self-innovated ALTP heat-flux sensor and its performance tests[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(6): 86–91. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20190148
[18]	李强, 万兵兵, 杨凯, 等. 高超声速尖锥边界层压力脉动和热流脉动特性试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 124956. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24956 LI Q, WAN B B, YANG K, et al. Experimental research on characteristics of pressure and heat flux fluctuation in hypersonic cone boundary layer[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(2): 124956. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24956
[19]	段金鑫, 李强, 杨凯, 等. 原子层热电堆热流传感器在激波风洞试验中的应用[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(3): 27–34. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200934 DUAN J X, LI Q, YANG K, et al. Atomic layer thermopile heat-flux sensor and its application in shock tunnel tests[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(3): 27–34. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200934
[20]	YANG K, YANG Q T, ZHU X X, et al. A molecular dynamics simulation on the static calibration test of a revised thin-film thermopile heat-flux sensor[J]. Measurement, 2020, 150: 107039. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107039
[21]	朱新新, 朱涛, 杨凯, 等. 小尺寸Schmidt-Boelter热流传感器的研制[J]. 实验流体力学, 2021, 35(4): 106–111. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20200065 ZHU X X, ZHU T, YANG K, et al. Development of small size Schmidt-Boelter heat flux sensor[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 35(4): 106–111. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20200065
[22]	TIM R, HELMUT K, UWE G, et al. Time-resolved heat transfer measurements on the tip wall of a ribbed channel using a novel heat flux sensor—part I: sensor and benchmarks[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130(1): 011018. doi: 10.1115/1.2751141
[23]	KNAUSS H, ROEDIGER T, BOUNTIN D A, et al. Novel sensor for fast heat flux measurements[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2009, 46(2): 255–265. doi: 10.2514/1.32011
[24]	WANG H, ZHU T, ZHU X X, et al. Inverse estimation of hot-wall heat flux using nonlinear artificial neural networks[J]. Measurement, 2021, 181: 109648. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109648
[25]	胡芃, 陈则韶. 量热技术和热物性测定[M]. 2版. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009. HU P, CHEN Z S. Thermotechnical and thermophysical properties measurement[M]. 2nd ed. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2009.
[26]	庄新港, 刘红博, 张鹏举, 等. 低温辐射计热结构设计与分析[J]. 物理学报, 2019, 68(6): 27–33. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181880 ZHUANG X G, LIU H B, ZHANG P J, et al. Design and analysis of thermo-structure for cryogenic radiometer[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(6): 27–33. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181880
[27]	ROBERT G. A transducer for the measurement of heat-flow rate[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1960, 82(4): 396–398. doi: 10.1115/1.3679968
[28]	罗跃, 杨凯, 黄伟, 等. 用于高温高压剪切流场的Gardon计研制[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(29): 139–144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.29.020 LUO Y, YANG K, HUANG W, et al. Design and fabrication of gardon fage used in shear flow filed of high temperature/pressure[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(29): 139–144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.29.020
[29]	曾磊, 石友安, 孔荣宗, 等. 薄膜电阻温度计原理性误差分析及数据处理方法研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2011, 25(1): 79–83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.01.016 ZENG L, SHI Y A, KONG R Z, et al. Study on principle error analysis and data processing method of thin film resistance thermometer[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 25(1): 79–83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.01.016
[30]	钱炜祺, 周宇, 邵元培. 表面热流辨识结果的误差分析与估计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(4): 687–693. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0185 QIAN W Q, ZHOU Y, SHAO Y P. Error analysis of surface heat flux estimation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(4): 687–693. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0185
[31]	SHI Y A, ZENG L, QIAN W Q, et al. A data processing method in the experiment of heat flux testing using inverse methods[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 29(1): 74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2013.01.009