Citation: | Liu Erwei, Xu Shengli. Flow field visualization for ethylene/air auto-ignition at different pressures and temperatures in a rectangular shock tube[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(1): 62-71. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20180051 |
[1] |
Hanson R K, Davidson D F. Recent advances in laser absorption and shock tube methods for studies of combustion chemistry[J]. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, 2014, 44(5):103-114. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=32a48adc67662fe720c9b40098405349
|
[2] |
Ren W, Davidson D F, Hanson R K. IR laser absorption diagnostic for C2H4 in shock tube kinetics studies[J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2012, 44(6):423-432. DOI: 10.1002/kin.v44.6
|
[3] |
Barari G, Pryor O, Koroglu B, et al. High temperature shock tube experiments and kinetic modeling study of diisopropyl ketone ignition and pyrolysis[J]. Combustion & Flame, 2017, 177:207-218. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=44a2d934b262dc7667b3fd5aa0b0fe26
|
[4] |
Ning H B, Wu J J, Ma L H, et al. Combined ab initio, kinetic modeling, and shock tube study of the thermal decomposition of ethyl formate[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2017, 121(35):6568-6579. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05382
|
[5] |
李兰, 陈其盛, 赵文涛.基于成像的RP-3煤油在激波管内自点火过程研究[J].推进技术, 2015, 36(10):1504-1508. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjjs201510008
Li L, Chen Q S, Zhao W T. A study of RP-3 autoignition in shock tube based on imaging[J]. Journal of Propulsion Techno-logy, 2015, 36(10):1504-1508. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjjs201510008
|
[6] |
廖钦.煤油及其裂解产物自点火现象的初步实验研究[D].合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2009. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10358-2009110958.htm
Liao Q. Experimental studies on autoignition phnomena of kerosene and cracked kerosene in a shock tube[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2009. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10358-2009110958.htm
|
[7] |
王高峰.基于激波管实验平台的甲烷燃烧化学动力学机理研究[D].合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10358-2009024956.htm
Wang G F. A shock tube study of methane combustion chemical kinetics mechanism[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10358-2009024956.htm
|
[8] |
Herzler J, Jerig L, Roth P. Shock-tube study of the ignition of propane at intermediate temperatures and high pressures[J]. Combustion Science & Technology, 2004, 176(10):1627-1637. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=bec22ebed9618b4f4e3a2dae9a8b0e70&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[9] |
胡弘浩.乙烯点火特性及其污染效应的激波管研究[D].重庆: 重庆大学, 2012. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10611-1012049448.htm
Hu H H. A shock tube study of ignition delay characteristics of ethylene and comtamination effect[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2012. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10611-1012049448.htm
|
[10] |
Baker J A, Skinner G B. Shock-tube studies on the ignition of ethylene-oxygen-argon mixtures[J]. Combustion & Flame, 1972, 19(3):347-350. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=d47422c247a6bfc2c9a72aece709c7cb&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[11] |
Suzuki M, Moriwaki T, Okazaki S, et al. Oxidation of ethylene in shock tube[J]. Astronautica Acta, 1973, 18(5):359-365. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=8ee245eea4938d57a7aa5d612a979c44&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[12] |
Brown C J, Thomas G O. Experimental studies of shock-induced ignition and transition to detonation in ethylene and propane mixtures[J]. Combustion & Flame, 1999, 117(4):861-870. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=45b8d493fc3ef59ad3bd48381bc9e406&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[13] |
Cadman P, Bambrey R J, Box S K, et al. Ethylene combustion studied over a wide temperature range in high-temperature shock waves[J]. Combustion Science & Technology, 2002, 174(11-2):111-127. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=0024ddd0f00d3b071b32ebe639cf0bae&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[14] |
Saxena S, Kahandawala M S P, Sidhu S S. A shock tube study of ignition delay in the combustion of ethylene[J]. Combustion & Flame, 2011, 158(6):1019-1031. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=e1b428a0420bc7aa851798c81f57e8fc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[15] |
梁金虎.煤油点火延时特性及其污染效应的激波管研究[D].重庆: 重庆大学, 2011. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10611-1012008763.htm
Liang J H. Ignition delay characteristics study of kerosene and contaminated kerosene in shock tube[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2011. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10611-1012008763.htm
|
[16] |
Deng F Q, Pan Y S, Sun W C, et al. Comparative study of the effects of nitrous oxide and oxygen on ethylene ignition[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(12):14116-14128. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=ad573a7c017db8d45d134c5159eb9dc9&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[17] |
Pfahl U, Fieweger K and Adomeit G. Self-ignition of diesel-relevant hydrocarbon-air mixtures under engine conditions[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1996, 26(1):781-789. DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80287-6
|
1. |
韩笑,高创,郑怡彤,刘小兵. 切角凹槽矩形截面桥塔的气动特性试验研究. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 9-15+23 .
![]() | |
2. |
白桦,刘博祥,姬乃川,李加武. 节段模型二元端板合理尺寸估算方法. 振动与冲击. 2023(02): 312-320 .
![]() | |
3. |
王仰雪,刘庆宽,靖洪淼,李震,孙一飞. 倾斜栏杆对流线型箱梁涡激振动性能影响的试验研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(06): 232-239+254 .
![]() | |
4. |
于畅,仇法梅,田学东,杨群,刘小兵. 圆角矩形柱平均气动力特性的雷诺数效应试验研究. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 29-34 .
![]() | |
5. |
杨群,于畅,刘小兵,刘庆宽. 不同圆角率的方形断面斯特罗哈数的雷诺数效应研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(11): 223-231 .
![]() | |
6. |
刘庆宽,王仰雪,孙一飞,李震,韩原,靖洪淼. 栏杆高度对流线型箱梁涡振性能影响的试验研究. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(07): 140-150 .
![]() | |
7. |
刘路路,杨皓然,邹云峰,何旭辉,韩艳,陈志强. 公铁同层双幅非对称主梁气动干扰特性研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(10): 3861-3872 .
![]() | |
8. |
杨群,于畅,于文文,刘小兵. 圆角方柱气动特性的风洞试验研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(24): 59-68 .
![]() | |
9. |
韩振,李波,甄伟,杨庆山,田玉基. 宽厚比为5的超高层建筑风荷载特性研究. 哈尔滨工程大学学报. 2022(02): 196-202 .
![]() | |
10. |
张庆华,马文勇,杨杰,张彦,周帅伟. 不同风倾角下典型等边角钢静风力风洞试验研究. 振动工程学报. 2022(02): 277-283 .
![]() | |
11. |
白桦,王涵,姬乃川,李加武. 节段模型长宽比对风洞测力试验及计算分析的影响. 中国公路学报. 2022(08): 202-212 .
![]() | |
12. |
杨群,刘庆宽,韩瑞,刘小兵. 不同圆角率的方形断面气动特性的雷诺数效应. 振动与冲击. 2020(04): 150-156 .
![]() | |
13. |
沈国辉,姚剑锋,郭勇,邢月龙,楼文娟. 直径30 cm圆柱的气动力参数和绕流特性研究. 振动与冲击. 2020(06): 22-28 .
![]() | |
14. |
温青,池俊豪,华旭刚,王修勇,孙洪鑫. 端部条件和展弦比对矩形断面节段模型气动力特征的影响. 实验流体力学. 2020(04): 36-43 .
![]() | |
15. |
任若松,梁新华,刘小兵,马文勇,刘庆宽. 准流线型桥梁断面气动力特性的雷诺数效应研究. 工程力学. 2020(S1): 139-144+167 .
![]() | |
16. |
李海飞,梁新华,孙一飞,崔会敏,刘庆宽. 流线型桥梁断面表面脉动风荷载特性研究. 工程力学. 2020(S1): 242-248+260 .
![]() | |
17. |
马文勇,汪冠亚,郑熙,陈铁,李智,张程远,方平治. 端部状态对斜置圆柱气动力分布的影响. 实验流体力学. 2019(02): 43-50 .
![]() | |
31. |
杨群,刘庆宽,孙亚松,刘小兵. 圆角方形断面气动特性试验. 振动.测试与诊断. 2020(01): 140-147+208 .
![]() |