留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

大梯度低速流场中五孔探针测量误差修正方法研究

谢金伟 郭涛 张京 刘存良

谢金伟, 郭涛, 张京, 等. 大梯度低速流场中五孔探针测量误差修正方法研究[J]. 实验流体力学, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230009
引用本文: 谢金伟, 郭涛, 张京, 等. 大梯度低速流场中五孔探针测量误差修正方法研究[J]. 实验流体力学, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230009
XIE J W, GUO T, ZHANG J, et al. Investigation on error correction method of five-holes probes used in flow field with large velocity gradient[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230009
Citation: XIE J W, GUO T, ZHANG J, et al. Investigation on error correction method of five-holes probes used in flow field with large velocity gradient[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230009

大梯度低速流场中五孔探针测量误差修正方法研究

doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230009
详细信息
    作者简介:

    谢金伟:(1989—),男,湖北十堰人,硕士,高工。研究方向:航空发动机部件试验测试技术。通信地址:成都市新都区学府路999号(610500)。E-mail:helloxjw@foxmail.com

    通讯作者:

    E-mail:guotao@nwpu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V211.71

Investigation on error correction method of five-holes probes used in flow field with large velocity gradient

  • 摘要: 为探究大梯度流场下五孔探针的失真特性,建立了用于修正速度梯度(ΔV/V)所引起的测量误差的数据处理方法。从五孔探针测量原理出发,研究了梯度流场下,气流角和梯度大小对于五孔探针测量误差的影响,提出了减小测量误差的修正方法;采用实验方法验证了该修正方法的准确性。研究结果表明,探针的速度测量误差远小于角度误差,在所研究的梯度范围内(ΔV/V = ± 0.3)通常可忽略;探针角度测量误差通常较为显著,其大小不仅受速度梯度的影响,还与气流的来流角度有关。实验结果证明了本文提出的基于梯度和气流角的修正方法能有效减小角度测量误差。
  • 图  1  五孔探针结构示意图

    Figure  1.  Five-hole probe structural parameters

    图  2  角度校准系数

    Figure  2.  Angle calibration coefficients

    图  3  速度校准系数

    Figure  3.  Velocity calibration coefficients

    图  4  总压校准系数

    Figure  4.  Total pressure calibration coefficients

    图  5  均匀流场探针头部几何对应关系

    Figure  5.  Model of flow field of constant velocity magnitude

    图  6  梯度流场探针头部几何对应关系

    Figure  6.  Model of flow field of gradients

    图  7  λ随Δβ、ΔV/Vβ的变化规律

    Figure  7.  λ as a function of Δβ,ΔV/V and β

    图  8  Kββ、ΔV/V的变化关系

    Figure  8.  Kβ as a function of β and ΔV/V

    图  9  角度测量误差Δβ随速度梯度的变化(β = 0°)

    Figure  9.  The measurement error of the angle Δβ changes with the gradient of the velocity as a function of speed (β = 0°)

    图  10  c(β)随角度β的变化

    Figure  10.  c(β) as a function of β

    图  11  实验系统图

    Figure  11.  System of Experiment

    图  12  多孔板

    Figure  12.  Multi-orifice plate

    图  13  五孔探针模型

    Figure  13.  The five-hole probe model

    图  14  探针与热线风速仪测量结果对比

    Figure  14.  Distribution of measuring results of velocity by probes and hot-wire anemometer

    图  15  z向梯度流场下,气流角修正前后结果对比

    Figure  15.  Comparison of uncorrected and corrected results of flow angle in flow field of z direction gradient

    图  16  y向梯度流场下,气流角修正前后结果对比

    Figure  16.  Comparison of uncorrected and corrected results of flow angle in flow field of y direction gradient

  • [1] 李俊青. PIV的原理与应用[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2015, 21(3): 40–42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2015.03.015

    LI J Q. Theory and application of PIV[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2015, 21(3): 40–42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2015.03.015
    [2] 张艳艳, 巩轲, 何淑芳, 等. 激光多普勒测速技术进展[J]. 激光与红外, 2010, 40(11): 1157–1162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2010.11.001

    ZHANG Y Y, GONG K, HE S F, et al. Progress in laser Doppler velocity measurement techniques[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2010, 40(11): 1157–1162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2010.11.001
    [3] 常严. 闭环恒温式热线风速传感器的设计[J]. 机械制造与自动化, 2008, 37(4): 21–23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5276.2008.04.007

    CHANG Y. Design of a hot wire anemometer with constant temperature feedback[J]. Jiangsu Machine Building & Automation, 2008, 37(4): 21–23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5276.2008.04.007
    [4] SITARAM N, LAKSHMINARAYANA B, RAVINDRANATH A. Conventional probes for the relative flow measurement in a turbomachinery rotor blade passage[J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1981, 103(2): 406–414. doi: 10.1115/1.3230735
    [5] SHREEVE R, ANDERSON D, OLSON J. Calibration and application of multiple-sensor pneumatic probes for velocity determination with corrections for boundary effects[C]//Proc of the 9th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference. 1976. doi: 10.2514/6.1976-373
    [6] LIGRANI P M, SINGER B A, BAUN L R. Spatial resolution and downwash velocity corrections for multiple-hole pressure probes in complex flows[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1989, 7(6): 424–426. doi: 10.1007/BF00193427
    [7] 马兴宇, 明晓. 七孔探针测量剪切流场的误差分析和实验验证[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2012, 30(1): 57–62,67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2012.01.010

    MA X Y, MING X. Experimental research and error analysis on seven-hole probe measurements of shearing flow field[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(1): 57–62,67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2012.01.010
    [8] 马宏伟, 蒋浩康. 速度梯度、近壁效应和Re数对压力探针测量误差的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 1995, 10(4): 337–342. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.1995.04.002

    MA H W, JIANG H K. Effects of velocity gradient, wall-proximity and Reynolds number on measuring errors of pressure probes[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 1995, 10(4): 337–342. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.1995.04.002
    [9] 马宏伟, 蒋浩康. 速度梯度和近壁效应对压力探针测量误差的影响[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 1997, 10(4): 42–47.
    [10] 王洪伟, 方剑, 王治. 速度梯度对圆柱探针测量的影响及修正[J]. 航空动力学报, 2008, 23(4): 712–717. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2006.z1.030

    WANG H W, FANG J, WANG Z. Error correction for cylinder probes measuring the flow with velocity gradient[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(4): 712–717. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2006.z1.030
    [11] LIVESEY J L. The behavior of transverse cylindrical and forward facing total pressure probes in transverse total pressure gradients[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1956, 23(10): 949–955. doi: 10.2514/8.3695
    [12] LIGHTHILL M J. Contributions to the theory of the Pitot-tube displacement effect[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1957, 2(5): 492–512. doi: 10.1017/s0022112057000294
    [13] HALL I M. The displacement effect of a sphere in a two-dimensional shear flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1956, 1(2): 142–162. doi: 10.1017/s002211205600010x
    [14] HOENEN H T, KUNTE R, WANICZEK P, et al. Measuring failures and correction methods for pneumatic multi-hole probes[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. 2013. doi: 10.1115/GT2012-68113
    [15] DIXON S L. Measurement of flow direction in a shear flow[J]. Journal of Physics E:Scientific Instruments, 1978, 11(1): 31–34. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/11/1/008
    [16] SEVILLA E. Experimental investigation of the systematic errors of pneumatic pressure probes induced by velocity gradients[D]. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, 2002.
    [17] 林其勋. 热工与气动参数测量[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 1995.
    [18] 梁德旺, 赵瑛. 流体力学基础[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 1998.
  • 加载中
图(16)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  126
  • HTML全文浏览量:  85
  • PDF下载量:  15
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-01
  • 修回日期:  2023-03-21
  • 录用日期:  2023-05-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-06-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    重要公告

    www.syltlx.com是《实验流体力学》期刊唯一官方网站,其他皆为仿冒。请注意识别。

    《实验流体力学》期刊不收取任何费用。如有组织或个人以我刊名义向作者、读者收取费用,皆为假冒。

    相关真实信息均印刷于《实验流体力学》纸刊。如有任何疑问,请先行致电编辑部咨询并确认,以避免损失。编辑部电话0816-2463376,2463374,2463373。

    请广大读者、作者相互转告,广为宣传!

    感谢大家对《实验流体力学》的支持与厚爱,欢迎继续关注我刊!


    《实验流体力学》编辑部

    2021年8月13日