邱祥海, 杜林, 孙晓峰. 航空声衬声阻抗实验提取技术研究进展[J]. 实验流体力学, 2024, 38(3): 1-19. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20230060
引用本文: 邱祥海, 杜林, 孙晓峰. 航空声衬声阻抗实验提取技术研究进展[J]. 实验流体力学, 2024, 38(3): 1-19. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20230060
Qiu X H, Du L, Sun X F. Research progress on acoustic impedance eduction technology of aeronautical liner[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(3): 1-19. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20230060
Citation: Qiu X H, Du L, Sun X F. Research progress on acoustic impedance eduction technology of aeronautical liner[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 38(3): 1-19. DOI: 10.11729/syltlx20230060

航空声衬声阻抗实验提取技术研究进展

Research progress on acoustic impedance eduction technology of aeronautical liner

  • 摘要: 本文综述了航空声学环境下声衬声阻抗实验提取技术,介绍了多种方法的基本原理、实验布置、研究进展和优劣势。在低频平面波场下,介绍了阻抗管法、单模态法,以及目前主流的目标函数法和直接提取法,其中直接提取法因具有高效、准确的解析优势而受到认可,以上方法均受模态成分限制而存在频率上限。在高频多模态场下,介绍了原位测量法、三维目标函数法、多模态直接提取法、准三维直接提取法、镜像多模态直接提取法,这些方法解决了模态限制,可在不同程度上拓展频率上限。原位测量法的侵入性测量导致其误差和局限性大,三维目标函数法因需三维数值模拟和迭代而效率极低,多模态直接提取法因测点横向间距小而精度不足,准三维直接提取法因受最高阶模态限制而测点需求量大。镜像多模态直接提取法能较好地解决上述问题,它采用锯齿形阵列,基于声场周期性和镜像原理,先将物理阵列展开为多倍宽度等效声场中的对角映射阵列,再调用多模态直接提取法以多模态Prony算法进行声场分解,进而提取声阻抗。镜像多模态直接提取法打破了以往3 kHz的频率上限,能覆盖航空发动机风扇噪声0.2~10 kHz的主要频带,全频提取仅需1 min,比三维目标函数法的效率至少高3个量级,准确性和可靠性较高,且测点大幅减少,兼具宽频、高效、准确、测点少且无损的优势。

     

    Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the impedance eduction techniques of liners in aeroacoustic environments, including the basic principles, experimental arrangements, research progress and features of various methods. In low-frequency plane-wave fields, the impedance tube method, the single mode method, the current mainstream Objective Function Method (OFM) and Straightforward Method (SFM) are available, the latter of which is recognized for high efficiency and accuracy. But all these methods are confined to low-frequency ranges for the modal component limitation. In high-frequency multimodal fields, the in-situ method, the three-dimensional (3D) OFM, the Multimodal SFM (M-SFM), the quasi-3D SFM and the Mirror-based Multimodal SFM (MM-SFM) are developed. All of them address the modal limitation and thus can extend the upper frequency limit to different degrees. The in-situ method suffers from invasive tests resulting in significant errors and limitations. The 3D-OFM suffers from an iteration of 3D numerical simulations resulting in extremely low efficiency. The M-SFM suffers from small transverse spacing between adjoint probes so that its accuracy is not enough. The quasi-3D-SFM suffers from large demand for measuring probes depending on the highest-order mode. The MM-SFM can effectively solve the above problems. It adopts a zigzag array and unfolds it into a mapping diagonal array in a multiple-width equivalent sound field, based on the field periodicity and the mirror symmetry, and then invokes the multimodal Prony algorithm of the M-SFM to decompose the field, so as to educe the acoustic impedance finally. This method breaks the previous upper frequency limit of 3 kHz and can cover the main frequency range of 0.2−10 kHz for aeroengine fan noises; takes only 1 minute to conduct a full-frequency eduction which is at least 3 orders of magnitude more efficient than the 3D-OFM; is of high accuracy and reliability; and decreases the probe number significantly. Generally, it possesses advantages of broadband, efficient, accurate, fewer-probes and non-invasive tests.

     

/

返回文章
返回