基于风洞试验的格构式圆钢排风塔体型系数与风振响应研究

Study on shape coefficient and wind-induced vibration response of latticed circular steel exhaust tower based on wind tunnel test

  • 摘要: 目前针对格构式排风塔的整体体型系数取值研究十分有限,未考虑结构间干扰作用的两主要构件风荷载直接叠加难以满足精细化设计需求。故本文基于高频天平测力试验和气弹模型风洞试验,研究了结构在亚临界区的体型系数取值与A类湍流风场作用下的风振响应。试验结果表明:格构式排风塔体型系数受风向角影响显著,随着风向角的增大呈现先减小再增大的趋势,极大值在0°风向角。而规范体型系数极大值在45°风向角,按规范取值会误判平均风荷载计算时的最不利风向角,并高估74.39%的静风荷载。在0°-45°风向角下,结构在A类风场中均会发生随风速提高不断增大的顺风向和横风向抖振响应,无明显涡振响应。横风向抖振响应幅值与顺风向抖振响应幅值相当,不容忽视。结构顺风向风振系数沿高度变化曲线是外凸的,受风向角影响较小,而规范的风振系数取值为内凹曲线,最大差异为89.97%。横风向风振系数受风向角影响较大,格构式钢管排风塔结构自身杆件间相互作用形成的特征湍流对结构的横风向抖振响应较顺风向更明显。

     

    Abstract: Current research on the overall shape coefficient of lattice tower and their internal exhaust chimney remains limited. Directly superimposing wind loads of the two main components without considering interference effects between structures fails to meet the requirements of refined design. Therefore, based on high-frequency force balance (HFFB) tests and aeroelastic model wind tunnel experiments, this study investigates the shape coefficient of the structure in the subcritical regime and its wind-induced vibration response under terrain A wind fields. The experimental results show that the shape coefficient of the lattice chimney is significantly influenced by wind direction angle, initially decreasing and then increasing as the wind direction angle grows, with its peak value occurring at 0°. In contrast, the code-specified shape coefficient reaches its maximum at 45°, leading to a misjudgment of the most unfavorable wind direction angle for mean wind load calculations and an overestimation of static wind load by 74.39%. Within wind direction angles of 0°–45°, the structure exhibits continuously increasing along-wind and across-wind buffeting responses under Class A wind fields as wind speed rises, with no significant vortex-induced vibration observed. The amplitude of the across-wind buffeting response is comparable to that of the along-wind response and should not be neglected. The along-wind wind-induced vibration coefficient varies convexly along the height and is less affected by wind direction angle, whereas the code-specified wind-induced vibration coefficient follows a concave curve, with a maximum deviation of 89.97%. The across-wind wind-induced vibration coefficient is more sensitive to wind direction angle, and the characteristic turbulence generated by the interaction between members of the lattice steel chimney has a more pronounced effect on the across-wind buffeting response than on the along-wind response.

     

/

返回文章
返回