Experimental research on the mixture properties inside cloud cavitation region

WANG Benlong; ZHANG Hao; LIU Yunqiao

doi:10.11729/syltlx20220138

Volume 37 Issue 5

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics > 2023 > 37(5): 111-121

WANG B L, ZHANG H, LIU Y Q. Experimental research on the mixture properties inside cloud cavitation region[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37(5): 111-121 doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220138

Citation:

PDF( 5894 KB)

Experimental research on the mixture properties inside cloud cavitation region

doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220138

Engineering Mechanics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai　200240, China

Received Date: 2022-11-30
Accepted Date: 2023-06-03
Rev Recd Date: 2023-05-20
Publish Date: 2023-10-30

Abstract

Abstract

Cavitating flows are unique phenomena in the research field of hydrodynamics. Within the cavitation region, vapor and water are mixed in a complex state. Special experimental techniques are required to obtain the mixture properties. Both non-intrusive and intrusive techniques for cavitating mixture measurement are reviewed, including ionizing radiation, endoscopy, electrical impedance probes and optical fiber probes. In comparison with the experimentally demanding non-intrusive methods, intrusive probe techniques provide simple and stable single-point measurements for the void fraction, bubble velocity and bubble size. Recent applications of phase-resolved probe techniques are then introduced. The electrical impedance probe and optical fiber probe were used in the mixture property measurements in wedge-plate and hydrofoil cavitation, respectively. The time-averaged void fraction and statistical distribution of the bubble size were obtained. The results indicate that the void fraction within cloud cavitation is closely related to the cavitation number, and the characteristics of the bubble size distribution are quite similar between the two kinds of cloud-cavitating flows (wedge-plate and hydrofoil cavitation).
- cavitation,
- two-phase flows,
- void fraction,
- bubble size distribution

FullText(HTML)

References(53)

References

[1]	TORTORA P R, CECCIO S L, O’HERN T J, et al. Quantitative measurement of solids distribution in gas–solid riser flows using electrical impedance tomography and gamma densitometry tomography[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2006, 32(8): 972–995. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.03.004
[2]	COUTIER-DELGOSHA O, STUTZ B, VABRE A, et al. Analysis of cavitating flow structure by experimental and numerical investigations[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 578: 171–222. doi: 10.1017/s0022112007004934
[3]	MÄKIHARJU S A, PERLIN M, CECCIO S L. Time resolved X-ray densitometry for cavitating and ventilated partial cavities[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2013, 60(1-4): 471–494.
[4]	GANESH H, MÄKIHARJU S A, CECCIO S L. Bubbly shock propagation as a mechanism for sheet-to-cloud transition of partial cavities[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 802: 37–78. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2016.425
[5]	ZHANG G J, KHLIFA I, FEZZAA K, et al. Experimental investigation of internal two-phase flow structures and dynamics of quasi-stable sheet cavitation by fast synchrotron X-ray imaging[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(11): 113310. doi: 10.1063/5.0029963
[6]	ZHANG G J, KHLIFA I, COUTIER-DELGOSHA O. A comparative study of quasi-stable sheet cavities at different stages based on fast synchrotron X-ray imaging[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(12): 123316. doi: 10.1063/5.0031433
[7]	ZHANG G J, ZHANG D S, GE M M, et al. Experimental investigation of three distinct mechanisms for the transition from sheet to cloud cavitation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 197(1): 123372. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123372
[8]	STUTZ B, LEGOUPIL S. X-ray measurements within unsteady cavitation[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(2): 130–138. doi: 10.1007/s00348-003-0622-0
[9]	COUTIER-DELGOSHA O, DEVILLERS J F, PICHON T, et al. Internal structure and dynamics of sheet cavitation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2006, 18(1): 017103. doi: 10.1063/1.2149882
[10]	AESCHLIMANN V, BARRE S, LEGOUPIL S. X-ray attenuation measurements in a cavitating mixing layer for instantaneous two-dimensional void ratio determination[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2011, 23(5): 055101. doi: 10.1063/1.3586801
[11]	陆芳, 陆林章, 庞业珍, 等. 实船螺旋桨空泡观测[C]//第十三届全国水动力学学术会议暨第二十六届全国水动力学研讨会论文集. 2014.
[12]	MARASHDEH Q, FAN L S, DU B, et al. Electrical capacitance tomography – A perspective[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(10): 3708–3719. doi: 10.1021/ie0713590
[13]	ADAM M S, YANG W Q, WATSON R. A capacitance tomographic system for the measurement of void fraction in transient cavitation[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1998, 36(4): 707–719. doi: 10.1080/00221689809498617
[14]	BANASIAK R, WAJMAN R, JAWORSKI T, et al. Study on two-phase flow regime visualization and identification using 3D electrical capacitance tomography and fuzzy-logic classification[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2014, 58: 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.07.003
[15]	AL HOSANI E. Electrical capacitance tomography for real-time monitoring of process pipelines[D]. Bath: University of Bath, 2016.
[16]	邓峰, 熊春明, 陈诗雯, 等. 油气多相流磁共振在线检测方法及装置[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4): 798–808. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.04.17 DENG F, XIONG C M, CHEN S W, et al. A method and device for online magnetic resonance multiphase flow detection[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 798–808. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.04.17
[17]	袁景峰. 核磁共振两相流测量方法与系统研究[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2020. YUAN J F. Research on measurement method and system of NMR two-phase flow[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Shiyou University, 2020.
[18]	赵喜平. 磁共振成像[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
[19]	BROWN R W, CHENG Y C N, HAACKE E M, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2014. doi: 10.1002/9781118633953
[20]	ARBABI A, MASTIKHIN I V. Magnetic susceptibility based magnetic resonance estimation of micro-bubble size for the vertically upward bubbly flow[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2012, 225: 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.09.012
[21]	MASTIKHIN I, ARBABI A, BADE K M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging measurements of a water spray upstream and downstream of a spray nozzle exit orifice[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2016, 266: 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.03.005
[22]	MASTIKHIN I V, ARBABI A, NEWLING B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of velocity fields, the void fraction and gas dynamics in a cavitating liquid[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2012, 52(1): 95–104. doi: 10.1007/s00348-011-1209-9
[23]	ARBABI A. Magnetic resonance study of two-phase gas-liquid systems[D]. Fredericton: University of New Brunswick, 2015.
[24]	ADAIR A, MASTIKHIN I V, NEWLING B. Motion-sensitized SPRITE measurements of hydrodynamic cavitation in fast pipe flow[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2018, 49: 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.025
[25]	JOHN K, BRUSCHEWSKI M, JAHANGIR S, et al. Mean flow field measurements in cavitating flow using magnetic resonance velocimetry supported by X-ray and particle image velocimetry[C]//Proc of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts. 2019.
[26]	朱礼涛, 罗正鸿. 磁共振成像应用于多相流体动力学研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(9): 3765–3773. doi: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180192 ZHU L T, LUO Z H. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to multiphase fluid hydrodynamics[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(9): 3765–3773. doi: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180192
[27]	郭春雨, 郐云飞, 韩阳, 等. 舰船流场试验测试技术研究进展[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2022, 17(5): 103–115. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02857 GUO C Y, KUAI Y F, HAN Y, et al. Review of research on ship flow field measurement technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(5): 103–115. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02857
[28]	NEAL L G, BANKOFF S G. A high resolution resistivity probe for determination of local void properties in gas-liquid flow[J]. AIChE Journal, 1963, 9(4): 490–494. doi: 10.1002/aic.690090415
[29]	MILLER N, MITCHIE R E. Measurement of local voidage in liquid/gas two-phase flow systems using a universal probe[J]. Journal of the British Nuclear Energy Society, 1970, 9(2): 94–100.
[30]	ABUAF N, JONES O C Jr, ZIMMER G A. Optical probe for local void fraction and interface velocity measure-ments[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1978, 49(8): 1090–1094. doi: 10.1063/1.1135524
[31]	CARTELLIER A, ACHARD J L. Local phase detection probes in fluid/fluid two-phase flows[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1991, 62(2): 279–303. doi: 10.1063/1.1142117
[32]	CARTELLIER A. Optical probes for local void fraction measurements: characterization of performance[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1990, 61(2): 874–886. doi: 10.1063/1.1141457
[33]	CARTELLIER A. Simultaneous void fraction measurement, bubble velocity, and size estimate using a single optical probe in gas-liquid two-phase flows[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1992, 63(11): 5442–5453. doi: 10.1063/1.1143416
[34]	CARTELLIER A, BARRAU E. Monofiber optical probes for gas detection and gas velocity measurements: conical probes[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1998, 24: 1265–1294. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00032-9
[35]	CARTELLIER A, BARRAU E. Monofiber optical probes for gas detection and gas velocity measurements: optimized sensing tips[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1998, 24: 1295–1315. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00033-0
[36]	CARTELLIER A. Measurement of gas phase characteristics using new monofiber optical probes and real-time signal processing[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1998, 184: 393–408. doi: 10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00211-8
[37]	CARTELLIER A. Post-treatment for phase detection probes in non uniform two-phase flows[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1999, 25(2): 201–228. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00041-X
[38]	BARRAU E, RIVIÈRE N, POUPOT Ch. Single and double optical probes in air-water two-phase flows: real time signal processing and sensor performance[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1999, 25(2): 229–256. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00042-1
[39]	STUTZ B, REBOUD J L. Experiments on unsteady cavitation[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1997, 22(3): 191–198. doi: 10.1007/s003480050037
[40]	STUTZ B, REBOUD J L. Two-phase flow structure of sheet cavitation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1997, 9(12): 3678–3686. doi: 10.1063/1.869505
[41]	LUTHER S, RENSEN J, GUET S. Bubble aspect ratio and velocity measurement using a four-point fiber-optical probe[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2004, 36(2): 326–333. doi: 10.1007/s00348-003-0725-7
[42]	SUN X, VASAVADA S, CHOI S W, et al. Interfacial structure in an air-water planar bubble jet[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2005, 38(4): 426–439. doi: 10.1007/s00348-004-0921-0
[43]	ENRIQUE JULIÁ J, HARTEVELD W K, MUDDE R F, et al. On the accuracy of the void fraction measurements using optical probes in bubbly flows[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76(3): 035103. doi: 10.1063/1.1862192
[44]	VEJRAŽKA J, VEČEŘ M, ORVALHO S, et al. Measurement accuracy of a mono-fiber optical probe in a bubbly flow[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2010, 36(7): 533–548. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.03.007
[45]	ROJAS G, LOEWEN M R. Fiber-optic probe measurements of void fraction and bubble size distributions beneath breaking waves[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2007, 43(6): 895–906. doi: 10.1007/s00348-007-0356-5
[46]	BLENKINSOPP C E, CHAPLIN J R. Bubble size measurements in breaking waves using optical fiber phase detection probes[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2010, 35(2): 388–401. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2010.2044940
[47]	HONG M, CARTELLIER A, HOPFINGER E J. Characterization of phase detection optical probes for the measurement of the dispersed phase parameters in sprays[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2004, 30(6): 615–648. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.04.004
[48]	FELDER S, PFISTER M. Comparative analyses of phase-detective intrusive probes in high-velocity air–water flows[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 90: 88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.12.009
[49]	HERNANDEZ-ALVARADO F, KLEINBART S, KALAGA D V, et al. Comparison of void fraction measurements using different techniques in two-phase flow bubble column reactors[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 102: 119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.02.002
[50]	WAN C R, WANG B L, WANG Q, et al. Probing and imaging of vapor-water mixture properties inside partial/cloud cavitating flows[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2017, 139(3): 031303. doi: 10.1115/1.4035013
[51]	ZHANG H, LIU Y Q, WANG B L, et al. Phase-resolved characteristics of bubbles in cloud cavitation shedding cycles[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 256: 111529. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111529
[52]	DIAS S G, FRANCA F A, ROSA E S. Statistical method to calculate local interfacial variables in two-phase bubbly flows using intrusive crossing probes[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2000, 26(11): 1797–1830. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(99)00111-1
[53]	LIU Y Q, ZHANG H, ZHANG W, et al. Bubble size distribution at early stage of hydrodynamic cloud cavitation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35: 063305. doi: 10.1063/5.0154309