Free flight experiment on boundary layer transition of 7° half angle cone at Mach 6
-
摘要: 在气动物理靶上开展了半角7°圆锥的边界层转捩测量实验,模型材料为铝合金,表面采用氧化发黑处理或涂覆低热导率涂层,底径33mm,球头半径0.27~2.50mm,马赫数4.89~6.63,单位雷诺数4.8×107/m~5.2×107/m,总迎角0.8°~5.8°,采用阴影和红外辐射成像获得了模型边界层图像和转捩阵面形貌,测得转捩雷诺数介于2.4×106~5.6×106之间.结果表明:转捩雷诺数随迎角增大而减小;一定的球头钝化可以推迟转捩。Abstract: A series of boundary layer transition measurements of the 7° half angle cone at Mach 6 in the Aero-physic Range were conducted. The models are made of aluminum alloy with black oxidation or low thermal conductivity coating. The base diameter of the cone is 33mm, and the radius of the nose tip is among 0.27~2.50mm. The parameter covers Mach number 4.89~6.63, Unit Reynolds number 4.8×107/m~5.2×107/m, and the total angle of attack 0.8°~5.8°. The boundary layer shadowgraph and surface inferred images which reflect the transition line configuration were obtained, and the transition Reynolds number was calculated to be 2.4×106~5.6×106. The results indicate that:the transition Reynolds number decreases by enlarging the angle of attack, certain nose tip scale would delay the transition.
-
表 1 弹道靶转捩实验状态参数表
Table 1. Test conditions
No. Φ/mm L/mm R/mm Ra/μm v/(km·s-1) p/kPa T/℃ Ma Re/L/(107m-1) Re/106 ZL03 32.91 130.63 0.46 0.88 1.70 44.34 27.6 4.89 4.82 6.30 ZL04 32.89 130.69 0.45 0.88 2.05 37.40 24.9 5.92 4.95 6.47 ZL05 32.93 132.66 0.27 0.88 2.17 37.06 25.0 6.27 5.19 6.88 ZL07* 32.95 127.29 0.99 4.78 2.18 37.09 27.3 6.27 5.18 6.59 ZL08 32.92 132.51 0.30 0.88 2.29 32.30 23.3 6.63 4.80 6.36 ZL09 32.82 116.60 2.50 0.88 2.08 37.70 23.2 6.03 5.09 5.94 ZL10* 32.92 130.69 0.45 1.56 2.15 37.72 28.0 6.18 5.18 6.77 注:Φ为模型底径,L为模型长度,R为模型球头半径,Ra为模型表面粗糙度均值,v为模型飞行速度,p为靶室压力,T为靶室温度,Re/L为单位雷诺数,Re为模型雷诺数,标记*的实验模型表面为低热导率涂层。 表 2 弹道靶转捩实验测量结果
Table 2. Test result of ballistic range transition measurement
No. R/mm Ma Re/L/(107m-1) 球头雷诺数/104 俯仰角/(°) 侧滑角/(°) 迎角/(°) 转捩距离/mm 转捩雷诺数/106 迎风侧 背风侧 迎风侧 背风侧 ZL03 0.46 4.89 4.82 4.43 5.0 2.9 5.8 50 60 2.41 2.89 ZL04 0.45 5.92 4.95 4.45 0.8 0.2 0.8 104 113 5.16 5.60 ZL05 0.27 6.27 5.19 2.80 -2.2 0.0 2.2 83 74 4.30 3.85 ZL07 0.99 6.27 5.18 10.30 0.6 2.0 2.1 79 82 4.10 4.25 ZL08 0.30 6.63 4.80 2.88 -0.7 1.7 1.8 86 114 4.12 5.46 ZL09 2.50 6.03 5.09 25.50 -1.2 0.8 1.4 未转捩 未转捩 未转捩 未转捩 ZL10 0.45 6.18 5.18 4.66 -0.6 4.9 4.9 63 57 3.28 2.96 -
[1] Lau K Y. Hypersonic boundary-layer transition:application to high-speed vehicle design[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(2):176-183. doi: 10.2514/1.31134 [2] Wilkins M E, Darsow J F. Finishing and inspection of model surfaces for boundary-layer-transition tests[R]. NASA Memo 1-19-59A, 1959. [3] James C S. Boundary-layer transition on hollow cylinders in supersonic free flight as affected by Mach number and a screwthread type of surface roughness[R]. NASA Memo 1-20-59A, 1959. [4] Potter J L. Boundary-layer transition on supersonic cones in an aeroballistic range[J]. AIAA Journal, 1975, 13(3):270-277. doi: 10.2514/3.49692 [5] Sheetz N W Jr. Free-flight boundary layer transition investiga-tions at hypersonic speeds[R]. AIAA-1965-0127, 1965. [6] Reda D C. Boundary-layer transition experiments on sharp, slender cones in supersonic freeflight[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(8):803-810. doi: 10.2514/3.61231 [7] Reda D C, Wilder M C, Bogdanoff D W, et al. Aerothermo-dynamic testing of ablative reentry vehicle nosetip materials in hypersonic ballistic-range environments[R]. AIAA-2004-6829, 2004. [8] Grinstead J H, Wilder M C, Reda D C, et al. Advanced spectroscopic and thermal imaging instrumentation for shock tube and ballistic range facilities[R]. RTO-EN-AVT-186, 2010. [9] Reda D C, Wilder M C, Prabhu D K. Transition experiments on blunt bodies with isolated roughness elements in hypersonic flight[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2010, 47(5):828-835. doi: 10.2514/1.49112 [10] Reda D C, Wilder M C, Prabhu D K. Transition experiments on slightly blunted cones with distributed roughness in hypersonic flight[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(10):2248-2254. doi: 10.2514/1.J051616 [11] Reda D C, Wilder M C, Prabhu D K. Transition experiments on blunt cones with distributed roughness in hypersonic flight[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2013, 50(3):504-508. doi: 10.2514/1.A32426 [12] Wilder M C, Prabhu D K, Reda D C. The effects of surface roughness on turbulent heat transfer measured in hypersonic free flight[R]. AIAA-2014-0512, 2014. [13] Swanson T, Daniel D. Hypersonic boundary layer transition experiments in hypervelocity ballistic Range G[R]. AIAA-2016-2118, 2016. [14] 柳森, 王宗浩, 谢爱民, 等.高超声速锥柱裙模型边界层转捩的弹道靶实验[J].实验流体力学, 2013, 27(6):26-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.06.005Liu S, Wang Z H, Xie A M, et al. Ballistic range experiments of hypersonic boundary layer transition on a cone-cylinder-flare configuration[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(6):26-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.06.005 [15] Wang Z H, Liu S, Xie A M, et al. Shadowgraph imaging and post-processing for hypersonic boundary layer transition in ballistic range[J]. Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing, 2015, 22(4):229-238. doi: 10.1615/JFlowVisImageProc.2016016555 [16] 柳森, 黄洁, 李毅, 等.中国空气动力研究与发展中心的空间碎片超高速撞击试验研究进展[J].载人航天, 2011, 17(6):17-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5825.2011.06.004Liu S, Huang J, Li Y, et al. Recent advancement of hypervelocity impact tests at HAI, CARDC[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2011, 17(6):17-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5825.2011.06.004 [17] 柳森, 谢爱民, 黄洁, 等.超高速碰撞碎片云的激光阴影照相技术[J].实验流体力学, 2005, 19(2):35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2005.02.007Liu S, Xie A M, Huang J, et al. Laser shadowgraph for the visualization of hypervelocity impact debris cloud[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 19(2):35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2005.02.007 [18] Settles G S. Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques:visualizing phenomena in transparent media[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 2001. [19] Muir J F, Trujillo A A. Experimental investigation of the effects of nose bluntness, free-stream unit Reynolds number, and angle of attack on cone boundary layer transition at a Mach number of 6[R]. AIAA-72-0216, 1972. [20] 陈坚强, 涂国华, 张毅锋, 等.高超声速边界层转捩研究现状与发展趋势[J].空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(3):311-337. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0030Chen J Q, Tu G H, Zhang Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition:what we know, where shall we go[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(3):311-337. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0030 [21] Bountin D A, Shiplyuk A N, Sidorenko A A. Experimental investigations of disturbance development in the hypersonic boundary layer on a conical model[C]//Laminar-Turbulent Transition: IUTAM Symposium. 1999: 475-480.