Design and processing of a continuous aero-elastic shell model of high-rise flexible structures
-
摘要: 气弹模型制作是高柔结构风洞试验的关键点和难点。针对高柔结构,详细介绍了一种采用"开模、灌胶、再拆模"方式制作连续壳体气弹模型的方法:以石膏制作内模、有机玻璃雕刻外模,精确设计石膏内模和玻璃外模之间的缝隙尺寸,在缝隙内灌注DEVCON胶剂;胶剂固化后,拆模即制成连续气弹壳体模型。动力特性测试结果表明:该模型能够较为精确地模拟实际结构的质量、阻尼以及一、二阶振型和频率,能够再现典型的风致振动现象,证实了制作方法的可靠性。制作方法简便易行、造价低、精度高、通用性强,可为高层建筑、高柔烟囱、化工塔、电视塔、冷却塔等高柔结构的连续气弹壳体模型制作提供指导。Abstract: The wind tunnel test of the aero-elastic model is an accurate method to assess the wind effect on the high-flexible structures, and the model making is the key point during this process. A novel method to make the continuous aero-elastic shell model is proposed, and the main steps as well as key techniques of the model manufacture are discussed in detail. Firstly, the inner mold is made of gypsum, the outer mold is carved by organic glass, and the gap dimension between the inner and outer mold is precisely designed in this step. After that, the DEVCON glue is injected into the gap. Finally, the inner and outer mold is removed after the glue is cured, and then the aero-elastic model is done. Dynamic test results show that the mass, the damping ratio, the first two order mode shape and the frequency of the realistic structure could be simulated accurately. The making method of this article has the following advantages:low time-consuming, economic, high precision and good versatility. Moreover, this method can be used for the continuous aero-elastic model of high-rise buildings, high-rise flexible chimneys, chemical towers, TV towers, cooling towers and so on. So the making method proposed in this paper can be an important guideline for the similar structures.
-
表 1 简化烟囱与实际烟囱的整体质量与频率
Table 1. Frequency and quality of simplified chimneys and actual chimneys
烟囱质量 一阶频率 二阶频率 实际烟囱 3.2×107 kg 0.26 Hz 1.16 Hz 简化烟囱 3.2×107 kg 0.26 Hz 1.30 Hz 误差 0.0% 0.0% 12.0% 表 2 气弹模型相似参数
Table 2. Similarity parameters of the aero-elastic model
实际结构 相似比值 气弹模型目标值 几何尺寸(高度) 300 m 1:250 1.20 m 质量 32.2×106 kg 1:2503 2.06 kg 一阶频率 0.26 Hz 100:1 26 Hz 二阶频率 1.16 Hz 100:1 116 Hz 位移 — 1:250 — 速度 — 1:2.5 — 加速度 — 40:1 — 表 3 烟囱模型测试结果
Table 3. Test results of the chimney model
烟囱质量 一阶频率 二阶频率 阻尼 目标值 2.06 Kg 26 Hz 116 Hz 4.0% 烟囱模型 1.96 Kg 26 Hz 118 Hz 3.6% 误差 预留质量 0.0% 1.7% 可调节 -
[1] Whitbread R E. Model simulation of wind effects on structures[C]//Proceedings of Symposium on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures. 1963: 284-302. [2] Vickery B J. Study on the aeroelastic modeling of structures in wind[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Structures Models. 1972: 48-56. [3] Wang L, Liang S G, Huang G Q, et al. Investigation on the unstability of vortex induced resonance of high-rise buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 175:17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.025 [4] Yoshie R, Kawai H, Shimura M, et al. A study on wind-induced vibration of super high rise building by multi-degree-of freedom model[J]. Journal of Wind Engineeringand Industrial Aerodynamics, 1997, 69-71:745-755. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=5a1235ee655ec932d3cc4f950a36c211 [5] 王磊, 梁枢果, 邹良浩, 等.超高层建筑多自由度气弹模型的优势及制作方法[J].振动与冲击, 2014, 33(17):24-29, 67. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201417005Wang L, Liang S G, Zou L H, et al. The advantages and making method of super high-rise building's multi-DOF aero-elastic model[J]. Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(17):24-29, 67. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201417005 [6] Isyumov N. The aeroelastic modelling of tall buildings[C]//Proceedings of International Workshop on Wind Tunnel Modeling for Civil Engineering Application. Gaithersburg, America: Cambridge University Press, 1982: 373-407. [7] 全涌, 顾明, 黄鹏.超高层建筑通用气动弹性模型设计[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 29(1):122-126. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjdxxb200101026Quan Y, Gu M, Huang P. Design of super-high rise buildings' global aeroelastic model[J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science, 2001, 29(1):122-126. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjdxxb200101026 [8] 刘昊夫.典型超高层建筑气动弹性的实验研究[D].汕头: 汕头大学, 2012. [9] Niemann H J, Kopper H D. Influence of adjacent buildings on wind effects on cooling towers[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20(10):874-880. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00131-4 [10] Armitt J. Wind loading on cooling towers[J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1980, 106(3):623-641 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kqdlxxb201803013 [11] 袁子厚, 陈明祥.长扁圆形烟囱风致振动风洞模拟试验研究[J].华中科技大学学报:城市科学版, 2008, 25(3):46-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/whcsjsxyxb200803013Yuan Z H, Chen M X. Wind tunnel simulation experiment investigation to wind caused vibration of long flat roundness chimney[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology:Urban Science Edition, 2008, 25(3):46-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/whcsjsxyxb200803013 [12] 邹云峰, 牛华伟, 陈政清.基于完全气动弹性模型的冷却塔风致响应风洞试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(6):60-67. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jzjgxb201306008Zou Y F, Niu H W, Chen Z Q. Wind tunnel test on wind-induced response of cooling tower based on full aero-elastic model[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(6):60-67. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jzjgxb201306008 [13] 赵林, 葛耀君, 曹丰产.双曲薄壳冷却塔气弹模型的等效梁格方法和实验研究[J].振动工程学报, 2008, 21(1):31-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2008.01.006Zhao L, Ge Y J, Cao F C. Equivalent beam-net design theory of aero-elastic model about hyperbolic thin-shell cooling towers and its experimental investigation[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2008, 21(1):31-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2008.01.006 [14] 柯世堂, 赵林, 葛耀君, 等.大型双曲冷却塔气弹模型风洞试验和响应特性[J].建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(2):61-68. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jzjgxb201002009Ke S T, Zhao L, Ge Y J, et al. Wind tunnel test on aeroelastic model of large hyperbolic cooling towers and features of wind-induced response[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010, 31(2):61-68. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jzjgxb201002009 [15] 邹云峰.巨型冷却塔群的风效应及其风洞试验方法研究[D].长沙: 湖南大学, 2014. [16] American Society of Civil Engineers. Wind tunnel model studies of buildings and structures[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 1987, 9:19-36. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=9792bdebafae009e719957bc727be5e2&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn