Experimental investigation on response characteristics of PIV tracer particles in high speed flow
-
摘要: 示踪粒子的跟随响应能力是影响高速流动PIV测量精度的重要因素。针对法向马赫数大于1.4的高速流动所提出粒子松弛特性分析模型,结合理论分析与数值模拟方法,发展了高速流动下的示踪粒子布撒技术,提高了PIV技术定量化测量能力。基于上海交通大学多马赫数风洞,以不同粒径的氧化钛颗粒作为示踪粒子,利用PIV技术观测Ma4的高速流动诱导的一道22°激波,结果显示30nm粒径的示踪粒子有更优秀的跟随响应能力;并以该粒子进行了不同条件下(包括斜激波与脱体激波)的跟随性实验验证,为高速流动PIV示踪粒子选择提供了实验支撑。Abstract: The tracer's tracking ability is the key factor affecting the measurement accuracy of high speed PIV. Particle relaxation modeling is presented for high speed flow with the normal mach number over 1.4. Based on the combination of theoretical analysis and numerical simulations, high speed PIV and the tracer particle seeding technology are developed, and the quantificational measurement ability of PIV is improved. Recent experimental results were obtained by the Multi-Mach number high-speed wind tunnel in Shanghai JiaoTong university where titanium dioxides of various sizes were used as tracers in the Mach 4 wind tunnel to induce a 22° shock wave. The results reveal that the 30nm titanium dioxide particle is the most qualified option. Meanwhile, various shock wave experiments (including oblique shock wave and detached shock wave) were carried out to validate the particle tracing ability. In this paper, multiple experimental results are put forward to support the selection of tracer particles of high speed PIV.
-
Key words:
- supersonic wind tunnel /
- PIV experiment /
- tracers /
- particle tracing ability /
- theoretical verification
-
表 1 实验工况
Table 1. Conditions of test cases
Ma Specific heat ratio γ Total-temperature/K Total-pressure/MPa 4 1.39 400 0.4 表 2 10°模型下示踪粒子松弛特性
Table 2. Relaxation characteristics of tracer particles on 10° wedge model
30nm 100nm Relative Reynold number 0.03 0.1 Particle Knudsen number 14 4 Relative Mach number 0.29(t=τ) Relaxation time/μs 1.55 5.24 Relaxation distance/mm 0.38 1.29 表 3 30nm示踪粒子尖劈模型诱导激波特性
Table 3. Induced shockwave characteristics over wedge models with 30nm tracer particles
10°wedge 30°wedge Relative Reynold number 0.03 0.08 Particle Knudsen number 14 14 Relative Mach number 0.27 0.78 Shock wave angle/(°) 22 44 Freestream velocity U/(m·s-1) 797.8 797.8 Velocity Un1/(m·s-1) 299.7 565.1 Shockwave strength Man1 3.71 2.87 Velocity Un2/(m·s-1) 157.6 151.9 Relaxation time/μs 1.55 1.97 Relaxation distance/mm 0.38 0.81 表 4 激波面角度
Table 4. Shock wave angle
理论值 100nm示踪粒子 30nm示踪粒子 激波面角度 22.23° 21.34° 21.75° 表 5 激波角与误差
Table 5. Shock wave angels and error of 30° and 45° models
10°模型 30°模型 45°模型 (度数) 误差 (度数) 误差 理论值 22.23 0 44.07 0 脱体激波 实验值 21.75 -2.1% 42.64 -3.2% 数值模拟 23.55 5.9% 44.28 0.5% -
[1] Scarano F, Haertig J. Application of non-isotropic resolution PIV in supersonic and hypersonic flows[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2009, 100(2):208-215. [2] Haertig J, Havermann M, Rey C, et al. Particle image velocimetry in Mach 3.5 and 4.5 shock-tunnel flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(6):1056-1060. doi: 10.2514/2.1787 [3] 徐惊雷. PIV技术在超及高超声速流场测量中的研究进展[J].力学进展, 2012, 42(1):81-90. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201200110672Xu J L. The development of the PIV experimental study of the super/hypersoinc flowfield[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2012, 42(1):81-89. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201200110672 [4] Schrijer F F J, Scarano F, Oudheusden B W V. Application of PIV in a Mach 7 double-ramp flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 41(2):353-363. doi: 10.1007/s00348-006-0140-y [5] Melling A. Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 1997, 8(12):1406-1406. doi: 10.1088-0957-0233-8-12-005/ [6] 赵玉新, 易仕和, 田立丰, 等.基于纳米粒子的超声速流动成像[J].中国科学, 2009, 39(12):1911-1918. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200902526593 [7] 陈小虎, 陈方, 刘洪, 等.高速流动PIV示踪粒子跟随性分析[J].气体物理, 2017, 2(4):36-45. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qtwl201704004Chen X H, Chen F, Liu H, et al. Tracking characteristics of PIV tracer particles in high speed flows[J]. Physics of Gases, 2017, 2(4):36-45. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qtwl201704004 [8] 易仕和, 何霖, 田立丰, 等.纳米示踪平面激光散射技术在激波复杂流场测量中的应用[J].力学进展, 2012, 42(2):197-205. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201200507863Yi S H, He L, Tian L F, et al. The application of nano-tracer planar laser scattering in shock wave field measurement[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2012, 42(2):197-205. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201200507863 [9] Chen F, Liu H, Rong Z. Development and application of nanoparticle tracers for PIV in supersonic and hypersonic flows[R]. AIAA-2012-0036. [10] 张亚, 陈方, 刘洪, 等.高速流动中PIV示踪粒子松弛特性研究[J].实验流体力学, 2013, 27(6):70-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.06.013Zhang Y, Chen F, Liu H, et al. Research on the relaxation characteristics of PIV tracer particles in supersonic flow[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(6):70-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.06.013 [11] 刘伟, 万国新, 陈景兵, 等.可压缩气固混合层中离散相与连续相的相互作用研究[J].计算力学学报, 2009, 26(1):8-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=SciencePaper201303040000216922Liu W, Wan G X, Chen J B, et al. Study on the interaction between the continuous and the dispersed phases in compressible gas-solid mixing layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2009, 26(1):8-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=SciencePaper201303040000216922 [12] 樊建人, 郑友取, 岑可法.三维气固两相混合层湍流拟序结构的直接数值模拟[J].工程热物理学报, 2001, 22(2):241-244. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2001.02.031Fan J R, Zheng Y Q, Cen K F. Direct numerical simulation in turbulent coherent structures of three-dimensional gas-particle two-phase mixing layer[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2001, 22(2):241-244. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2001.02.031 [13] 樊建人, 罗坤, 金晗辉, 等.直接数值模拟三维气固两相混合层中颗粒与流体的双向耦合[J].中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(4):153-157. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2003.04.031Fan J R, Luo K, Jin H H, et al. Direct numerical simulation of the two-way coupling effects between particles and fluid in the three-dimensional particle-laden mixing layer[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(4):153-157. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2003.04.031 [14] 李召好, 李法强, 马培华, 等.超细粉末团聚机理及其消除方法[J].盐湖研究, 2005, 13(1):31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-858X.2005.01.006Li Z H, Li F Q, Ma P H, et al. Eliminetion methods and mechanism of agglomeration of ultrafine powders[J]. Journal of Salk Lake Research, 2005, 13(1):31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-858X.2005.01.006 [15] Scarano F, Oudheusden B W V. Plannar velocity measurements of a two-dimensional compressible wake[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 34(3):430-441. doi: 10.1007/s00348-002-0581-x [16] Urban W, Mungal M, Urban W, et al. Planar velocity measurements in compressible mixing layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 431(431):189-222. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ0214907656 [17] Chen F, Liu H, Yang Z, et al. Tracking characteristics of tracer particles for PIV measurements in supersonic flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(2):577-585. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.12.033 [18] 刘洪, 陈方, 励孝杰, 等.高速复杂流动PIV技术研究实践与挑战[J].实验流体力学, 2016, 30(1):28-42. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract10899.shtmlLiu H, Cheng F, Li X J, et al. Practices and challenges on PIV technology in high speed complex flows[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(1):28-42. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract10899.shtml