Experimental study on droplet size measurement and control of icing cloud in icing wind tunnel
-
摘要: 准确测量与控制云雾粒径对结冰风洞开展试验具有重要意义。为了研究3m×2m结冰风洞的云雾粒径特性及其影响因素,应用相位多普勒飞行探头系统(PDI-FPDR)开展试验段云雾平均体积直径(MVD)的测量与控制实验,获取了不同状态下的MVD变化规律,通过综合对比分析,探索了压力、风速、温度等因素对云雾粒径的影响。结果表明:云雾粒径对喷雾系统水压、气压的变化十分敏感,且MVD与喷雾气压成反比;气流风速和温度对风洞中云雾液滴的蒸发和碰撞特性影响不明显,MVD受其影响不大,不同状态的最大相对偏差在±10%的误差范围内;MVD受风洞环境负压作用而显著减小。Abstract: Accurately measuring and controlling the droplet size is important for icing wind tunnel tests. To study droplet characteristics and its effects in the 3m×2m icing wind tunnel, a PDI-FP (Phase Doppler Interferometer Flight Probe)system is used for the MVD (Median Volume Diameter) measurement and control test, and the effect factors such as pressure, airspeed, and temperature are analyzed. The experimental results show that there are sensitive relationships between the droplet size and spray air/water pressures. The MVD is inversely proportional to the spray air pressure. The air speed and temperature don't have impact on MVD obviously with the maximum deviation less than ±10%. The MVD is significantly reduced by applying negative pressure.
-
Key words:
- icing wind tunnel /
- spray system /
- cloud parameters /
- droplet /
- evaporation /
- environment pressure
-
表 1 典型系数结果
Table 1. Typical coefficients
Water
pressure/MPaa b c d e 0.034 1708333.33 -572750.00 73629.83 -4497.77 136.67 0.054 405804.84 -195945.36 35914.17 -3130.51 134.45 0.074 -78487.95 35814.22 -3624.08 -413.31 85.16 0.094 -41773.28 25147.34 -4192.27 -97.25 75.59 0.104 -25815.19 19043.72 -4175.25 62.27 71.29 表 2 PDI-FP重复性测试结果
Table 2. Repeatability of PDI-FP
MVD/μm N 1 24.4 29.2 38.5 2 24.2 29.6 38.3 3 24.3 28.9 38.7 4 24.2 29.8 37.6 5 24.6 29.1 38.4 Average 24.3 29.3 38.3 σ 0.16 0.37 0.42 Relative 0.7% 1.3% 1.1% 表 3 风速影响的误差分析
Table 3. Error analysis of different airspeeds
MVD1/μm
(V=67m/s)MVD2/μm
(V=105m/s)Average
/μmσ
/μmRelative
/%50.50 49.97 50.23 0.38 0.80 44.37 41.97 43.17 1.70 3.90 36.47 34.10 35.28 1.67 4.70 30.57 28.47 29.52 1.48 5.00 25.57 23.60 24.58 1.39 5.70 21.57 20.27 20.92 0.92 4.40 16.30 16.17 16.23 0.09 0.60 14.03 15.37 14.70 0.94 6.40 表 4 温度影响的误差分析
Table 4. Error analysis of different static air temperatures
MVD1
/μmMVD2
/μmMVD3
/μmAverage
/μmσ
/μmRelative
/%50.50 55.20 50.81 52.17 2.63 5.00 44.37 46.13 44.77 45.09 0.93 2.10 36.47 37.90 38.50 37.62 1.04 2.80 30.57 31.33 33.73 31.88 1.65 5.20 25.57 25.27 25.07 25.30 0.25 1.00 21.57 22.00 21.90 21.82 0.23 1.00 16.30 17.07 17.33 16.90 0.54 3.20 14.03 14.53 15.57 14.71 0.78 5.30 -
[1] Schick R J. Spray technology reference guide:understanding drop size[M]. New York:Spraying Systems Co, 1997. [2] 裘燮刚, 韩凤华.飞机防冰系统[M].南京:航空专业教材编审组, 1985. [3] 林贵平, 卜雪琴, 申晓斌, 等.飞机结冰与防冰技术[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社, 2016. [4] 朱春玲, 朱程香.飞机结冰及其防护[M].北京:科学出版社, 2016. [5] Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE AIR4906 Droplet sizing instrumentation used in icing facilities[S]. SAE, 2007. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/StructuresMaterials/MLP/alt.html [6] Ide R F, Oldenburg J R. Icing cloud calibration of the NASA glenn icing research tunnel[R]. NASA/TM-2001-210689, 2001. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20080022418 [7] Zante J F V, Ide R F, Steen L E. NASA glenn icing research tunnel: 2012 cloud calibration procedure and results[R]. AIAA-2012-2933, 2012. [8] Zante J F V, Ide R F, Steen L E, et al. NASA glenn icing research tunnel: 2014 cloud calibration procedure and results[R]. NASA/TM-2014-218392, 2014. [9] Imperato L, Leone G, Vecchione L. Spray nozzles experiment comparison in laboratory and icing wind tunnel testing[R]. AIAA-2000-0487, 2000. http://www.academia.edu/28736889/The_new_CIRA_Icing_Wind_Tunnel_Spray_Bar_System_development [10] Bellucci M, Esposito B M, Marrazzo M, et al. Calibration of the CIRA IWT in the low speed configuration[R]. AIAA-2007-1092, 2007. [11] Esposito B M, Marrazzo M. Application of PDPA system with different optical configuration to the IWT calibration[R]. AIAA-2007-1094, 2007. [12] 易贤, 桂业伟, 杜雁霞, 等.结冰风洞水滴直径标定方法研究[J].实验流体力学, 2010, 24(5):36-41. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract9882.shtmlYi X, Gui Y W, Du Y X, et al. Study on the method of droplet diameter calibration in icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 24(5):36-41. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract9882.shtml [13] 符澄, 彭强, 张海洋, 等.结冰风洞喷嘴雾化特性研究[J].实验流体力学, 2015, 29(2):32-36. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract10823.shtmlFu C, Peng Q, Zhang H Y, et al. The atomization characteristics research for spray nozzle of icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 29(2):32-36. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract10823.shtml [14] 符澄, 彭强, 张海洋, 等.结冰风洞环境对喷嘴雾化特性的影响初步研究[J].实验流体力学, 2015, 29(3):30-34. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract10840.shtmlFu C, Peng Q, Zhang H Y, et al. Preliminary research on spray nozzle atomization characteristics in icing wind tunnel environment[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 29(3):30-34. http://www.syltlx.com/CN/abstract/abstract10840.shtml [15] Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE ARP 5905 calibration and acceptance of icing wind tunnels[S]. SAE, 2009. http://everyspec.com/FAA/FAA-AC-PUBS/download.php?spec=AC23.1419-2b.005185.pdf [16] Steen L E, Ide R F, Zante J F V. NASA Glenn icing research tunnel: 2014 and 2015 cloud calibration procedures and results[R]. NASA/TM-2015-218758, 2015. [17] 易贤. 结冰风洞云雾特性计算分析[R]. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2013.Yi X. Numerical investigation on the characteristics of icing clouds in the icing wind tunnel[R]. China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, 2013. [18] 丁继贤, 孙凤贤, 姜任秋.对流条件下环境压力对液滴蒸发的影响研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2007, 28(10):1104-1108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2007.10.007Ding J X, Sun F X, Jiang R Q. Effects of ambient pressure on fuel droplet evaporation ina convective environments[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2007, 28(10):1104-1108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2007.10.007