Experimental study of TRPIV for turbulent boundary layer of longitudinal concave curvature wall
-
摘要: 带有曲率和压力梯度作用的湍流边界层广泛地存在于各类工程应用中。以带有流向凹曲率的壁面(简称凹壁面)模型为研究对象,利用双相机大小视场的TRPIV系统分别测量了上游和下游两个不同流向位置的瞬时速度场。以光滑平板模型的实验数据为基准,研究了凹壁面上湍流边界层的变化规律。通过对比光滑平板的平均速度剖面和雷诺应力剖面,发现凹壁面情况下的平均速度剖面逐渐偏离了传统对数律,且湍流强度比平板情况下更弱。以
$ {\varLambda _{ci}} $ 准则识别出的顺向涡为条件进行条件相位平均,发现凹壁面中涡上方正脉动的峰值与空间尺度的变化相反,而下方的负脉动比平板情况更强。进一步使用空间两点相关方法提取相干结构,同时利用椭圆拟合的方法计算近壁区相干结构与壁面的倾角,发现凹壁面上相干结构沿流向的空间尺度逐渐增大。结果表明:当湍流边界层受到凹曲率和顺压梯度的共同作用时,近壁附近与尾迹区内湍流强度的差异增大,同时边界层内相干结构的旋涡强度增加;随着向下游的发展,缓冲层附近顺向涡上方正脉动的空间尺度增大,但峰值降低,而在对数律区的上侧则产生了相反的现象;凹壁面湍流边界层内相干结构向更高法向高度迁移的趋势减弱,且相干结构的空间尺度在下游一侧的增长幅度更大。Abstract: Turbulent boundary layers with curvature and pressure gradient are widely used in various engineering applications. A wall model with concave curvature in streamwise was used as the research object, and the instantaneous velocity fields at two different streamwise positions upstream and downstream were measured by TRPIV experiment with dual camera size field of view. Using experimental data from a smooth flat plate as a benchmark, the variation pattern of the turbulent boundary layer on a concave wall is investigated. By comparing the mean velocity profile and the Reynolds stress profile with those of the smooth flat plate, it was found that the mean velocity profile in the concave wall case gradually deviated from the conventional logarithmic law and that the turbulence intensity was weaker than that in the flat plate case. Conditional averaging is carried out under the condition of the prograde vortex identified by$ {\varLambda _{ci}} $ criterion. It is found that the peak of the positive fluctuations above the vortices in the concave wall varies oppositely to the scale range, while the negative fluctuations below the vortices is stronger than that of flat plate. The coherent structures were further extracted using a spatial two-point correlation method and the inclination of the coherent structures in the near-wall region to the wall was calculated using an ellipse fitting method. It was found that the scale range of the coherent structure on the concave wall gradually increases along the streamwise. The results show that when the turbulent boundary layer is subjected to a combination of concave curvature and favorable pressure gradient, the difference in turbulence intensity near the near-wall region and within the wake region increases, along with an increase in the intensity of vortices in the coherent structures within the boundary layer. With development downstream, the scale range of positive fluctuations above the prograde vortex on the buffer layer increases, but the peak value decreases, while the opposite phenomenon occurs on the upper side of logarithmic region. The trend of coherent structure migration to higher normal height in the curved wall turbulent boundary layer is weakened, and scale range of the coherent structures grows mainly towards the downstream side. -
表 1 边界层参数
Table 1. Boundary layer parameters
上游(L=2.0 m) 下游(L=2.3 m) 平板实验 U∞/(m·s−1) 0.316 0.328 0.267 uτ,large/(m·s−1) 0.0175~0.0180 0.0196~0.0203 0.0116 uτ,small/(m·s−1) 0.0179 0.0202 0.0116 δ99/mm 36.85 37.29 60.16 Reτ 659.6 753.3 697.9 K 9.03×10−7 1.68×10−6 — -
[1] YOU J,BUCHTA D A,ZAKI T A. Concave-wall turbulent boundary layers without and with free-stream turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2021,915:A4. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2021.12 [2] HOLLOWAY A G L,ROACH D C,AKBARY H. Combined effects of favourable pressure gradient and streamline curvature on uniformly sheared turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2005,526:303-336. doi: 10.1017/s0022112004003088 [3] LOPES A S,PIOMELLI U,PALMA J. Large-eddy simula-tion of the flow in an S-duct[J]. Journal of Turbulence,2006,7(11):1-24. doi: 10.1080/14685240500331900 [4] PATEL V C,SOTIROPOULOS F. Longitudinal curvature effects in turbulent boundary layers[J]. Progress in Aero-space Sciences,1997,33(1-2):1-70. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(96)00001-2 [5] HARUN Z,MONTY J P,MATHIS R,et al. Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2013,715:477-498. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2012.531 [6] SPALART P R. Numerical study of sink-flow boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,1986,172(1):307-328. doi: 10.1017/s0022112086001751 [7] AUBERTINE C D,EATON J K. Turbulence development in a non-equilibrium turbulent boundary layer with mild adverse pressure gradient[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2005,532:345-364. doi: 10.1017/s0022112005004143 [8] JOSHI P, LIU X F, KATZ J. Turbulence in accelerating boundary layers[C]//Proceedings of ASME/JSME/KSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. 2012. doi: 10.1115/AJK2011-25010 [9] VOLINO R J. Non-equilibrium development in turbulent boundary layers with changing pressure gradients[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2020,897:A2. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.319 [10] MERONEY R N,BRADSHAW P. Turbulent boundary-layer growth over a longitudinally curved surface[J]. AIAA Journal,1975,13(11):1448-1453. doi: 10.2514/3.7014 [11] SO R M C,MELLOR G L. Experiment on turbulent boundary layers on a concave wall[J]. Aeronautical Quarterly,1975,26(1):25-40. doi: 10.1017/s0001925900007174 [12] AROLLA S K,DURBIN P A. LES of spatially developing turbulent boundary layer over a concave surface[J]. Journal of Turbulence,2015,16(1):81-99. doi: 10.1080/14685248.2014.959126 [13] MATSUBARA K,MUROMOTO T. Two-point correlation and integral scale of spatially advancing curved channel flow at friction-velocity-based Reynolds number 550[J]. Interna-tional Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow,2019,77:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.03.003 [14] SALTAR G,ARAYA G. Reynolds shear stress modeling in turbulent boundary layers subject to very strong favorable pressure gradient[J]. Computers & Fluids,2020,202:104494. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104494 [15] UZUN A,MALIK M R. Simulation of a turbulent flow subjected to favorable and adverse pressure gradients[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics,2021,35(3):293-329. doi: 10.1007/s00162-020-00558-4 [16] COHEN E,GLOERFELT X. Influence of pressure gradients on wall pressure beneath a turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2018,838:715-758. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2017.898 [17] VOLCHKOV E P,MAKAROV M S,SAKHNOV A Y. Boundary layer with asymptotic favourable pressure gradient[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2010,53(13-14):2837-2843. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.02.014 [18] VOLINO R J,SCHULTZ M P. Determination of wall shear stress from mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress profiles[J]. Physical Review Fluids,2018,3(3):034606. doi: 10.1103/physrevfluids.3.034606 [19] JONES W P,LAUNDER B E. Some properties of sink-flow turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,1972,56(2):337-351. doi: 10.1017/s0022112072002903 [20] SPALDING D B. A new analytical expression for the drag of a flat plate valid for both the turbulent and laminar regimes[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1962,5(12):1133-1138. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(62)90189-8 [21] WILLERT C E. High-speed particle image velocimetry for the efficient measurement of turbulence statistics[J]. Ex-periments in Fluids,2015,56(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00348-014-1892-4 [22] 王建杰, 潘翀, 王晋军. 湍流边界层壁面剪切应力的光学测量及统计特性分析[C]//中国力学大会(CCTAM 2019)论文集. 2019. [23] NGUYEN T D,WELLS J C,NGUYEN C V. Wall shear stress measurement of near-wall flow over inclined and curved boundaries by stereo interfacial particle image velocimetry[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow,2010,31(3):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.12.002 [24] DIXIT S A,RAMESH O N. Large-scale structures in turbulent and reverse-transitional sink flow boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2010,649:233-273. doi: 10.1017/s0022112009993430 [25] ZHOU J,ADRIAN R J,BALACHANDAR S,et al. Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,1999,387:353-396. doi: 10.1017/s002211209900467x [26] LEHEW J A,GUALA M,McKEON B J. Time-resolved measurements of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer[J]. Experiments in Fluids,2013,54(4):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00348-013-1508-4 [27] 刘铁峰,王鑫蔚,唐湛棋,等. 超疏水表面对湍流边界层相干结构影响的TRPIV实验研究[J]. 实验流体力学,2019,33(3):90-96. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20180101LIU T F,WANG X W,TANG Z Q,et al. TRPIV experimental study of the effect of superhydrophobic surface on the coherent structure of turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2019,33(3):90-96. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20180101 [28] WU Y,CHRISTENSEN K T. Population trends of spanwise vortices in wall turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2006,568:555-76. doi: 10.1017/s002211200600259x [29] ADRIAN R J,MEINHART C D,TOMKINS C D. Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2000,422:1-54. doi: 10.1017/s0022112000001580 [30] 苏健,田海平,姜楠. 逆向涡对超疏水壁面减阻影响的TRPIV实验研究[J]. 力学学报,2016,48(5):1033-1039. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-16-140SU J,TIAN H P,JIANG N. Trpiv experimental investi-gation of the effect of retrograde vortex on drag-reduction mechanism over superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2016,48(5):1033-1039. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-16-140 [31] TANG Z Q,WU Y H,JIA Y X,et al. PIV measurements of a turbulent boundary layer perturbed by a wall-mounted transverse circular cylinder element[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion,2018,100(2):365-389. doi: 10.1007/s10494-017-9852-8 [32] ADRIAN R J. Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbu-lence[J]. Physics of Fluids,2007,19(4):041301. doi: 10.1063/1.2717527 [33] MARUSIC I. On the role of large-scale structures in wall turbulence[J]. Physics of Fluids,2001,13(3):735-743. doi: 10.1063/1.1343480 [34] JAISWAL P,MOREAU S,AVALLONE F,et al. On the use of two-point velocity correlation in wall-pressure models for turbulent flow past a trailing edge under adverse pressure gradient[J]. Physics of Fluids,2020,32(10):105105. doi: 10.1063/5.0021121