Study and development of total pressure probe and pitot tube in 3m×2m icing wind tunnel
-
摘要: 针对国内首座大型结冰风洞的调试和运行,设计了具有防除冰功能的总压探针和皮托管。采用了新的制造工艺在内腔狭小的管内盘绕布置加热器,并通过合理分配加热器密度,解决了新工艺带来的加热器易受损和局部过热问题;使用电源可调压技术,在不同试验状态下调节加热功率,避免整体过热或防除冰能力不足。静态测试、校准和风洞试验数据表明,研制的总压探针和皮托管可有效用于结冰风洞特殊环境。Abstract: The total pressure probe and the pitot tube with the anti-icing/deicing functions are important measurement equipment in icing wind tunnels for which the aerodynamic design is critical. Taking a cue from some airspeed head's manufacture, the total pressure probe and the pitot tube are designed, by using new techniques and deploying the proper heated cable distribution. They show reasonable results in the ground-based static testing, calibration and experiment in the icing wind tunnel with high reliability and insulating property according to China national military standard.
-
Key words:
- icing wind tunnel /
- anti-icing/deicing system /
- total pressure probe /
- pitot tube /
- reliability /
- insulating property
-
表 1 与某型空速管防除冰性能对比表(AC 115V)
Table 1. Comparison among pitot tubes
整体稳定功率/W 总压口稳定功率/W 拐角处加热功率/W 材料传热系数/(W·m-2·k-1) 壁厚/mm 总压口表面功率密度/(W·mm-2) 拐角处表面功率密度/(W·mm-2) 某型空速管 300 44.2 157 90 1.2 0.054 0.021 皮托管 300 48.3 100 108.9 1.2 0.064 0.0506 总压探针 155 48.3 / 108.9 1.2 0.076 / 表 2 皮托管校准系数
Table 2. Calibration coefficients of the pitot tube
皮托管编号 N0030001 N0030002 N0030003 N0030004 校准系数(ξ) 1.010384 1.012226 1.014766 1.010657 皮托管编号 N0030005 N0030006 N0030009 N0020001 校准系数(ξ) 1.002591 1.011154 1.009392 0.987981 -
[1] Edward A, Haering Jr Airdata. Measurement and calibration. NASA Technical Memorandum 104316, 1995. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=85128697&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [2] 王勋年. 低速风洞试验[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2002. [3] 孙志强, 周孑民, 张宏建, 等. 皮托管测量影响因素分析Ⅱ: 全压孔与静压孔的影响[J]. 传感器技术学报, 2007, 20(4): 941-944. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGJS200704052.htmSun Z Q, Zhou J M, Zhang H J, et al. On the influence factors in a pitot tube measurement II: influence of total and static ports[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2007, 20(4): 941-944. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGJS200704052.htm [4] Jost M, Schwegmann F, Kohler T. Flush air data system an advanced air data system for the aerospace industry[C]. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and control Conference and Exhibit. AIAA 2004-5028. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-5028 [5] 孙志强, 周孑民, 张宏建, 等. 皮托管测量影响因素分析I. 检测杆与安装角的影响[J]. 传感器技术学报, 2007, 20(3): 690-693. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGJS200703048.htmSun Z Q, Zhou J M, Zhang H J, et al. On the influencing factors in a pitot tube measurement I. influence of air horn and mounting angle[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2007, 20(3): 690-693. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGJS200703048.htm [6] 国防科学技术工业委员会. GJB1623-93总、静压系统设计和安装通用规范[S]. 北京: 中国航空综合技术研究所, 1993. [7] 郑刘, 陈志敏. 飞机机头气动补偿空速管的设计[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(7): 1189-1194. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201107004.htmZheng L, Chen Z M. Design of an aircraft nose aerodynamic compen pitot-static tube[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(7): 1189-1194. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201107004.htm [8] 郑莉. 某型空速管冰风洞试验报告[R]. 武汉航空仪表公司, 2013.Zheng L. Experimental report of some airspeed head in the icing wind tunnel[R]. Wuhan Aviation Instrument Co. Ltd., 2013. [9] 国防科学技术工业委员会. GJB836-90 补偿式总、静压受感器通用规范[S]. 北京: 中国航空综合技术研究所, 1990. [10] 国家质量技术监督局. JJG518-1998 皮托管检定规程[S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1998 [11] 王敏, 魏根宝, 马锦国, 等. 二等皮托管测风误差分析及偏差模拟计算[J]. 气象科技, 2013, 41(5): 843-846. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ201305009.htmWang M, Wei G B, Ma J G, et al.Measurement error analysis and deviation simulation of second-class pitot tube[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2013, 41(5): 843-846. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ201305009.htm [12] Icing wind tunnel interfacility comparison tests[R]. SAE Aerospace Information Report: AIR5666, 2012. http://www.doc88.com/p-5807657793897.html